1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sergij07 [2.7K]
2 years ago
8

Which of these statements about life insurance benefits is false?

Business
1 answer:
Zigmanuir [339]2 years ago
3 0
<span>Employers normally require employees to pay a large portion of thecost of the life insurance benefit.</span>
You might be interested in
Total revenue decreases as the price of a good increases. true or false
Ipatiy [6.2K]

Answer: False

Explanation:

Total Revenue is the total amount that is received in return on sales of goods and services.

It is calculated as Price multiply by Quantity.

If the price of a product increases the revenue would also increase ceteris paribus( all things being equal). If the price of a product was $10 and 4 units were purchased Total revenue would be $40 and if price increases to $20 and 4 units were still purchased total revenue would be $80 assuming that we’re not taking into consideration any other factor like elasticity or type of good.

If price increases revenue increases too.

8 0
2 years ago
Bill Builder entered into a contract with Carl's Carpets to supply him with the carpeting he needed to complete the renovation o
pshichka [43]

Answer:

consequential damages

Explanation:

According to my research on different types of law suits, I can say that based on the information provided within the question Bill can recover the 900 he lost from Carl as consequential damages. These are damages have happened because of one party's failure to meet a certain deadline or contractual obligation and can be proven in court. Therefore since Bill can prove that he lost the 900 because of Carl's negligence he will most likely win that case.

I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.

5 0
3 years ago
John was driving his car in a careless way, failing to drive as a reasonably prudent person would under the driving conditions.
Ilia_Sergeevich [38]

Answer:

1. <em>If this law of contributory negligence applies to the state, then Ramona will receive no compensation for the damages she sustained. </em>

<em> </em>2<em>. If this law of comparative negligence applies to this state, then Ramona will get 100% - 20% = 80% of the damages incurred in the accident, from John which will be $80,000</em>

<em />

Explanation:

In contributory negligence, the defense completely bars plaintiffs from any recovery if they contribute to their own injury through their own negligence.

<em>If this law of contributory negligence applies to the state, then Ramona will receive no compensation for the damages she sustained. </em>

<em> </em>

In comparative negligence, the plaintiff's damages is award by the percentage of fault that the fact-finder assigns to the plaintiff for his or her own injury i.e the plaintiff's damage compensation is reduced by percentage of his/her percentage of fault.

<em>If this law of comparative negligence applies to this state, then Ramona will get 100% - 20% = 80% of the damages incurred in the accident, from John</em>

this is 80% of $100,00 which is equal to <em>$80,000</em>

8 0
3 years ago
Tamara is 52 years old and her divorce became final on September 20, 2014 and has not been modified. The divorce decree stipulat
never [62]

Answer:

Please see attachment

Explanation:

Please see attachment

8 0
2 years ago
You wish to earn a return of 13% on each of two stocks, X and Y. Stock X is expected to pay a dividend of $3 in the upcoming yea
Otrada [13]

Answer: D. will be less than the intrinsic value of stock Y

Explanation:

Based on the information given above, the intrinsic value of Stock X will be calculated thus:

D1 = Dividend in next year = $3

g = growth rate = 7%

r = = 13%

Therefore, intrinsic value of Stock X will be:

= D1 / (r-g)

= 3 / (13% - 7%)

= 3/6%

= 3 / 0.06

= $50

Therefore, the intrinsic value of stock X is $50.

Intrinsic value of Stock Y will b calculated thus:

D1 = $4

g = 7%

r = 13%

Intrinsic value of Stock Y will be:

= D1 / (r-g)

= 4 / (13% - 7%)

= 4/6%

= 4 / 0.06

= 66.67

Intrinsic value of Stock Y is $66.67

Therefore, the intrinsic value of Stock X will be less than the intrinsic value of Stock Y

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • On January 2, 2018, Ava Co. issued at face value $53,300 of 9% bonds convertible in total into 9,649 shares of Ava's common stoc
    10·2 answers
  • An outside supplier has offered to make and sell the part to the company for $24.10 each. If this offer is accepted, the supervi
    10·1 answer
  • You can invest in taxable bonds that are paying a yield of 9.4 percent or a municipal bond paying a yield of 7.65 percent. Assum
    7·1 answer
  • An analyst determines the value of investment
    9·1 answer
  • The risk-free rate of return is 8%, the expected rate of return on the market portfolio is 15%, and the stock of Xyrong Corporat
    14·1 answer
  • A football team hires a consultant to advise them on which running back to sign to a 1-year contract. Each touchdown is worth an
    11·1 answer
  • QS 8-1 Cost of plant assets LO C1 Kegler Bowling buys scorekeeping equipment with an invoice cost of $190,000. The electrical wo
    15·1 answer
  • hey guys im sry for the miss of me not being here i got busy so i wanna catch up with yall so tell me everything tahts gonnin on
    14·1 answer
  • What would be the net effect of the government increasing the taxes by $10 billion at the same time that it decreased spending b
    12·1 answer
  • The present value of cash flow will be greater if we compound less frequently holding the stated interest rate constant. a. true
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!