1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zhenek [66]
3 years ago
10

Read the sentence. In the late 1600s, only a selected few were content among the Pueblo people. Which is the past participle in

this sentence? selected were among late
English
2 answers:
Ugo [173]3 years ago
7 0
The past participle is "a selected few"
Greeley [361]3 years ago
5 0
The answer is among
 ....i hope this could help
You might be interested in
How does the narrator feel immediately after he commits the murder? Do his feelings change? If so, how and why in Tell-Tale Hear
IceJOKER [234]

Immediately after he commits the murder, the narrator feels very calm and confident, he describes the whole situation in which he disarmed the body:

<em>First I cut off the  head, then the arms and the legs. I  was careful not to let a single drop  of blood fall on the floor. I pulled  up three of the boards that formed  the floor, and put the pieces of the  body there. Then I put the boards  down again, carefully, so carefully  that no human eye could see that  they had been moved.</em>

Then, while he is talking to the officers, he starts feeling guilty, so guilty that he imagines the sound of the heart beating. He thinks that the officers can also hear the sound and that they are setting a trap. He ends up confessing the murder:

<em>No! They heard! I was certain of it. They knew! Now it was they  who were playing a game with me. I was suffering more than I could  bear, from their smiles, and from that sound. Louder, louder, louder!  Suddenly I could bear it no longer. I pointed at the boards and cried,  “Yes! Yes, I killed him. Pull up the boards and you shall see! I killed  him. But why does his heart not stop beating?! Why does it not stop!?</em>


3 0
3 years ago
If a writer wanted to put emphasis on what happened, but wished to de-emphasize the person doing the action, which of these woul
levacccp [35]
The answer for this question would be B!
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statements about William Shakespeare’s sonnets are true? Check all that apply.
Inga [223]

Answer:

They have a fixed rhyme scheme and structure

They often present a problem and solution

They frequently focus on love a romance

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
write a dairy entry where you are open and honest to yourself. admit that you were lazy and wasted your time. make a promise to
liubo4ka [24]

Answer: When you don't wanna take a shower and then once you get in you wanna stay in.

Explanation: f

6 0
3 years ago
What did you think of the end of the movie Romeo and Juliet ?
Neporo4naja [7]
Often times people say that William Shakespeare was and still is a legend.  They <span>are correct.  It is amazing how Shakespeare's play Romeo and Juliet written </span><span>centuries ago can be better than Franco Zefferelli's movie production of Romeo </span><span>and Juliet, which had much better technology to work with only decades ago. </span><span>Although the movie appeared better, it left out some major parts.  The play had </span><span>better mood and plot details which made it much more dramatic and by far a </span><span>better presentation. </span><span>One major difference between the play and the movie occurs in mood.  An example </span><span>of this is the marriage scene.  In the marriage scene of the play, Romeo and </span><span>Juliet act very serious.  The reader can tell this by the way the two speak. </span><span>Romeo says that the Holy Words the Friar speaks can make something without an </span><span>equal (Act II, Scene 6, Line 4) which is a very intelligent thing to say. </span><span>Whereas, in the movie they kiss and giggle the entire time.  This leads the </span><span>viewer to believe that Franco Zefferelli wanted the two to look like fools, that </span><span>they could not do anything the way it is normally done because they are children </span><span>in search of quick love.  This is bad because it is not very realistic.  In </span><span>real-life, young adults would take the matter seriously because they know it is </span><span>a major step in life.  Because the play is not entirely trying to make the two </span><span>look bad, it is the better production. </span><span>Another major difference in the mood of the play and the movie is in the funeral </span><span>scene.  The funeral scene of the play is a very serious event.  Juliet's family </span><span>is very upset and think that they are the cause of her "death".  Also, the Friar </span><span>soothes the family of the loss of young Juliet's life (Act IV, Scene 5, Line 65). </span><span> However, in the movie version of the funeral scene, again everyone is sad but </span><span>this time the Friar lets out a giggle as he pretends to pray for Juliet.  This </span><span>is a major difference because if someone had seen the Friar giggle, it may have </span><span>changed the entire play.  They may have questioned him why he giggled but since </span><span>he would not have a reason he may just spill what he knows.  Since the movie was </span><span>once again unrealistic, the play is the better production in this scene as well. </span><span>Some other major differences between the play and the movie occurred in the plot </span><span>details.  One example of this is in the beginning of the story.  In the play, </span><span>Romeo is just getting over Rosaline "rejecting" him (Act I, Scene 1, Line 155). </span><span>This means that he could have just been very upset.  Resulting in him just </span><span>grabbing the first thing he could find which just happened to be Juliet.  If he </span><span>had never even met Rosaline he probably would have never met Juliet either. </span><span>Although in the movie version of this part, all that the viewer knows is that </span><span>Romeo is extremely upset from something that was never brought up.  If Franco </span><span>Zefferelli had added this to his production it would probably make more sense </span><span>that him just leaving it out and having the viewer guess what was the matter </span><span>with Romeo.  Due to this difference, the play once again is better because the </span><span>plot is more thought out then the movie where the viewer has to guess. </span><span>Another difference between the play and the movie in plot details is at the </span><span>ending of the entire story.  In the play, the families are finally at peace as </span><span>Romeo and Juliet's real funerals take place .  The Montague's even decide to </span><span>erect a gold statue of Juliet and the Capulet's shake hand's with them which are </span><span>very good signs that the long and bitter feud of the two families is over (Act V, </span><span>Scene 3, Line 295).  On the other hand,  the movie only shows that he two </span><span>families have come together.  But this is for a reason that virtually and two </span><span>groups would come together for-a funeral of one for one of their family members. </span><span>All that the families do to acknowledge each other is as they walk into the </span><span>church, they turn to face their equal in the opposite family.  This is probably </span><span>the biggest difference out of the productions because one of the goal's that </span><span>Romeo, Juliet and Friar Laurence had was that this marriage would end the </span><span>quarrels.  The play's version of this was better because nobody really wants to </span><span>see a sad story which Romeo and Juliet is until the end but the play makes it a </span><span>happy story (in a way) by one of Romeo and Juliet's primary goals being </span><span>completed, although they had to die for it. </span><span>Due to all of the examples listed here, the mood in the marriage scene, the mood </span><span>in the funeral scene, and the plot details in the beginning and the end of the </span><span>play, the play is without a doubt, the better production.  However, if Franco </span><span>Zefferelli had made his movie more as a work of art instead of a production, and </span><span>spent a little more time in doing so, he could have had himself one of the best </span>movies ever, which William Shakespeare did with his play Partner sites: Spanish Language Schools, Pit Bull, and Free Essays and Term Papers
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • When driving in fog or snow,_______
    13·2 answers
  • He set of lines spoken in the play are called
    11·1 answer
  • Please help i need someone to do my k12 homework asap (before friday)
    7·1 answer
  • What is more important: the place you go to or the people you travel with? Write an essay about it
    10·1 answer
  • The settingchanges after Rainsford sees lights in the distance. What is the new setting? What details are provided about it? How
    13·1 answer
  • Compare the different methods of thinking between the right&amp; left-brain sides
    6·2 answers
  • You look up synonyms for minimal. Which word do you see?
    11·2 answers
  • In a desperate situation how might most people feel<br> A bored<br> B panicked<br> C tired
    9·1 answer
  • Read the excerpts from Team Moon and the NASA article.
    10·1 answer
  • Pomocy klasa 5 stra 12 zad 1,2,3 OXFORD LINK
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!