Answer:
If Spain colonized Americs before we did then life could be way different. There wouldn't be a Revolutionary war or a Civil War. Spain would be more powerful cause of all of that land that they would have. Maybe they wouldve been no match for the Indians and the Indians may have fought all of them off. All of us today most likely would not be speaking English and would be Spanish witch would be wild. This is how life would be different if Spain took America over first.
DID THIS KINDA FAST BUT I HOPE IT HELPS
The answer would be the Sodium potassium pump. This structure is the one that plays the main role in the controle of different types of ions under normal cellular function, as well as when cellular function is abnormal. It exchanges sodium and potassium ions from inside and outside a cell through the cellular membrane. With this, a steady amount of ions are found inside and outside.
Answer:
Communism : Welfare Oriented ; Capitalism : Growth Oriented
Explanation:
Communism is the ideology of social organisation : which states that resources should be owned, managed, distributed by community.
Capitalism is the socio economic, political system, in which resources are privately owned. They are managed & distributed as per market driven interests.
Communism is a theory focusing on human welfare, Capitalism is a theory focusing on profit maximisation. Their ulterior guiding motives make them battling concepts. As, communism theorists argue against capitalism, that it is against social justice. Capitalism theorists argue against communism, that it is against growth.
A solution to winning this battle by a mediator approach is : Mixed Economy model, which includes the positive characteristics of both the models. It strikes the balance between growth & welfare objective.
Hamilton's next objective was to create a Bank of the United States, modeled after the Bank of England. A national bank would collect taxes, hold government funds, and make loans to the government and borrowers. One criticism directed against the bank was "unrepublican"--it would encourage speculation and corruption. The bank was also opposed on constitutional grounds. Adopting a position known as "strict constructionism," Thomas Jefferson and James Madison charged that a national bank was unconstitutional since the Constitution did not specifically give Congress the power to create a bank.
Hamilton responded to the charge that a bank was unconstitutional by formulating the doctrine of "implied powers." He argued that Congress had the power to create a bank because the Constitution granted the federal government authority to do anything "necessary and proper" to carry out its constitutional functions (in this case its fiscal duties).
In 1791, Congress passed a bill creating a national bank for a term of 20 years, leaving the question of the bank's constitutionality up to President Washington. The president reluctantly decided to sign the measure out of a conviction that a bank was necessary for the nation's financial well-being.
