(Paragraph 1) Should eyewitness testimony be allowed in the courtroom? No but at the same time yes. There are many reasons why they should but shouldn't. It is a risk to their safety, some eyewitnesses are not liable, they could be paid off but at the same time their testimony could help win a case. (Paragraph 2) Depending on a crime, the eyewitness safety could be in danger. If the case was against a member of a gang or mafia. They could send someone after that witness. This is reason why we have the Witness Protection Program. If they testify they put their lives at risk. (Paragraph 3) Having a witness is a key thing to have. If you have a witness you are the one who most likely the one to win the case. In some cases you could have problems with the witness not being liable, getting paid off to not say anything or to lie. Or in most cases if they are confused they will not have them testify. Or they aren't straight on the details and keep changing the story that usually means they are lying on what they saw.
Note: This is a summary. Add more and edit it to make it sound like something you would type.
Answer:
D. The breakeven point decreases.
Explanation:
Breakeven point of a business is defined as the point where it's total cost and total revenues are equal, at this point there is no gain or loss. Hen revenue is above this point profit is made, and when revenue is below this point there is loss.
The formula for break-even is
Breakeven point= Total fixed cost/(Sales price per unit- Variable cost per unit)
Since sales price and variable cost is constant, let's say
(Sales price per unit- Variable cost per unit)= constant (k)
So when we cross-multiply in the formula
Breakeven* k= Total fixed cost
It shows that Breakeven point is directly proportional to Total fixed cost.
So a reduction in Total fixed cost will result in a reduction in Breakeven point.
Answer:
The answer is given below
Explanation:
Compounding frequency is the number of times the interest is paid in a year. A higher compounding frequency for a investment with the same initial investment and time horizon would produce more interest and profit as compared to that with a lower compounding frequency. But for a smaller initial investment or less time horizon of higher compounding frequency as compared to larger initial investment or more time horizon of lower compounding frequency, that of the lower compounding frequency is more desirable because it would produce more interest.
Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following archives.
Explanation
You will find the procedures, formulas or necessary explanations in the archive attached below. If you have any question ask and I will aclare your doubts kindly.
Answer:
remains unchanged as price increases when demand is unit elastic.
Explanation:
Total revenue = price × quantity
Demand is elastic when a small change in price has a greater effect on the quantity demanded.
If price is increased and demand is elastic, quantity demanded would fall more than the increase in price and total revenue falls.
Demand is inelastic if a small change in price has little or no effect on quantity demanded.
If price is increased and demand is inelastic, change in quantity demanded would be less than changes in price. As a result, total revenue would increase.
Demand is unit elastic if a change in price has an equal proportional effect on quantity demanded. The elasticity of demand always sums up to one.
If price is increased and demand is unit elastic, there would be no change in total revenue.
I hope my answer helps you
