Answer:
$159,057
Explanation:
The computation of cost of goods sold is shown below:-
Total cost of goods available for sale = (7,200 × $10) + (4,000 × $13) + (12,000 × $13.50)
= $72,000 + $52,000 + $162,000
= $286,000
Total units = 7,200 + 4,000 + 12,000
= 23,200
Average cost per unit = Total cost of goods available for sale ÷ Total units
= $286,000 ÷ 23,200
= $12.33
So,
Cost of Goods sold = Sold units during the month × Average cost per unit
= 12,900 × $12.33
= $159,057
Therefore for computing the cost of goods sold for the month we simply applied the above formula.
Answer
$31,000
Explanation:
(c) $31,000
Explanation:
As per IRS for Earnings of Clergy, A licensed, commissioned, or ordained minister who performs ministerial services as an employee may be able to exclude from gross income the fair rental value of a home provided as part of compensation (a parsonage) or a housing allowance provided as compensation if it is used to rent or otherwise provide a home. In order to be able to exclude the housing allowance from income, the minister's employing organization must officially designate the housing allowance as such before paying it to the minister.The fair rental value of a parsonage or the housing allowance is excludable only for income tax purposes, and not for Self-employment tax purpose.
In the given case, the church did not designate any of Luke's salaries as a housing allowance. Hence it is not deductible from Gross Income for Income Tax Purposes and irrespective of designation or not, it is not deductible for self-employment tax.
Thus, Full salary of Luke i.e $31,000 must be included when figuring net income for self-employment tax.
Answer:
The answer is: She used the justice approach, realizing that the greater good is served because people learn to help each other in their own interest.
Explanation:
Justice approach: an ethical decision is a decision that distributes benefits and costs (or punishments) among those involved in a fair, equitable, and impartial way.
Paula used this approach because she believed the agents had acted improperly and that they were harming the US Secret Service.
I consider any organization a team, so in order for it to work well its members must be respected both by their peers and by the other teams´ members. If you consider the various types of activities this specific agency carries out, other not so friendly "teams" (other secret services or even terrorists) could use this type of information to damage or compromise those activities. So the well being of all the country was being jeopardized by a group of bad agents.
Answer:
Normally "check all that apply" is followed by answers to check...
Explanation:
A W-2 is a Tax statement
