Its true just like the person on top of me said
Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.
It allows citizens to influence policy, local values, and local government priorities
The following conclusions can be drawn:
A) Eli may still be covered in some cases,
B) Eli faces far more risk than the insured,
D) Eli may have to take precautions, but many factors are beyond his control
E) Not being able “to afford insurance” was the main factor in his not being covered.
Option: A, B, D and E
<u>Explanation</u>:
The tragedy resulted in big terror for Eli which was beyond his pain and insurance plan too, as he was going through huge pressure due to the outcome of the crash. His major concern was treatment expenses and doubt regarding reimbursements. Eli's situation was random as tragedy was not under his control but soon after Dave got a clean chit in the case of the crash he took a deep breath and felt protected.
The answer is: psychometric; Piagetian
According to the psychometric approach, the cognitive development could be measured by using numerical assessment with a standardized result. This is similar to Alfred's view who believe that those who give better performance in quantitative measures of variables tend to be more developed.
According to the Piagetian cognitive approach on the other hand, the cognitive development could only be measured by how well an individual is interacting with their biological traits and the environment around them (similar's to Jeanne's view)
