Why should i ever care just kidding
Answer:
15.20%
Explanation:
The computation of the M1 increase is shown below:
= (M1 End of the year 2011 - M1 end of the year 2010) ÷ M1 End of the year 2010
= ($2,311 billion - $2,006 billion) ÷ ($2,006 billion)
= 15.20%
Answer:
Both will bear
Explanation:
Both Mr. Janey and Ms. lacey will bear the incidence of the property tax increase because Mr. Janey has only shifted $540 ( $45 x 12) of the total $1200 by increasing the monthly rent charge of his tenant Ms. lacey by $45/month. Mr. Janey will pay only $660 of $1200 increase in tax and remaining will be paid by Mr Lacey.
Answer:
The principle in Law 'Nemo dat quod non habet' states that an individual connot give what he does not have
Indeed Tom can rescind the contract with Matthew as he possesses voidable title to the balls
Explanation:
Until consideration has moved from Matthew to Tom the validity of the agreement/Contract remains inconclusive.
Considering his Account is not funded means he has no valid title to the Balls, he is merely in possession of the Balls but not the Owner.
Tom can sue demanding a return of the Balls irrespective of Matthew having sold them to Aaron.
Another illustration could be given of a thief who sells off a property. Inspite of the Buyer being unaware, because the thief has a voidable title it makes the transaction invalid.
