No, I believe that multiple weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation would have hurt America in time. One of the biggest problems was the lack of detail and specific attributes that the Constitution brings from long discussion and debates over what is best for the country. America needed to strengthen it's central government if it wanted to get anywhere, so we may not have become so powerful if we left the majority of the power in the state's hands. Another lacking component was the fact that we had no Executive branch to enforce Congress' laws and no National court to determine the meaning of the laws. Another example is the making of one currency for the entire country. These examples and more could have hurt America if they wouldn't have written the Constitution.
A direct result of Rosa Park's refusal to give up her seat on a Montgomery bus in 1955 was the Montgomery Bus Boycott. <span>On December 1, 1955, four days before the </span>boycott<span>began, Rosa Parks, an African-American woman, refused to yield her seat to a white man on a </span>Montgomery bus<span>.</span>
I think it should be because diplomats is the representative of a nation and negotiating with other nations could be more easier if we're already friendly with the diplomat. Also the way we treat their diplomat is also the way of how we treat the nation he/she representing and it would add a good standing in the global status if we are respecting the diplomats.
Answer:
C-You would be chosen by lottery
D-You could only be a free man
A permanent army of soldiers that are paid
