Frist King in Jerusalem and also a fighter and a singer of Israel
Answer;
The three are;
1.justices is plainly giving back what is deserved.
<span>2. justices is interest of "strong,, governing parties". </span>
<span>3. "it is social necessity weak, but not valuable once one becomes strong."
</span>
Explanation;
<span>According to Plato, justice does not depend upon a chance, convention or upon external force. It is the right condition of the human soul by the very nature of man when seen in the fullness of his environment.He criticized strongly the conventional ideas of Justice presented differently by Cephalus, Polymarchus, Thrasymachus and Glaucon, and gave his own theory of justice.
</span>
I say Israel - and I hope this is taken in an utterly nonpartisan way, which takes absolutely no position vis-a-vis the legitimacy of either conservatism or the Israeli state. I just think some core aspects of Israeli government and society are in line with mainstream US conservatism: a free-market liberal democracy of course, but with formal religious-ethnic affiliation, compulsory military service with training on firearms (and licensing to possess same) for all citizens, and a generally hawkish stance on questions of military and defense. They are also highly security-oriented, some would say in a much more effective way than the US government, and its security apparatus employs profiling techniques which almost undoubtedly have a racial component (<span>and </span><span>conservatives would no doubt want to insist that these two facts are directly related). I believe that taxation rates are roughly on par with that in the US, if not a bit less... though not nearly as low as Switzerland. </span>
