Answer:
C. strictly liable for Will's injuries
Explanation:
In law, Strict liability is a situation when defendant is required to be responsible to a certain situation, but can't be considered as guilty to any violation.
There are two points that need to be highlighted from the case above:
1. Astor Manufacturing process has fulfilled all of its safety regulation for storing the dangerous product.
2. The dangerous product owned by Astor Manufacturing caused William's injury.
The regulations for hazard management is created by the government, and the leak is not caused by their negligence. It's caused by unexpected natural disaster. This is why we can't say that Astor is guilty to any violation.
But still, the chemical that they created injured William. The court will most likely force Astor to be responsible for all the medical expenses incurred by william.
No, its not illegal to order a pizza for someone else
Answer:
C) The company followed a low inventory system.
Explanation:
As the product was new, the correct estimate of expected sales could not be made, and with high demand and hype in the market the company, there was a high demand of the product.
This certainly led to stock out, and not meeting the customers needs.
Accordingly the reputation in market degraded.
This is because of low performance, because of shortage of inventory.
Therefore, the correct option is:
Poor Inventory system, which led to poor performance.
Answer:
$13400
Explanation:
<u>Workings</u>
Unit of of production
Direct materials - 3.10
Direct labor - 7.70
Variable manufacturing overhead - 8.2
Supervisor's salary - 3.6
Depreciation - 2.00
Allocated general overhead 7.20
Total cost - 31.8
Cost per year = 31.8*14000
445,200
Cost of buying = 25.50
Allocated general overhead - 7.20
Total cost =32.7
Annual cost 32.7*14000 = 457800
Annual opportunity cost of internal production = 26,000
The overall advantage of buying = 26000 - (457800-445200)
= 13,400
Explanation:
the study or principles of the way money, business and industry are organized
