The answer is B. If it were to cause anything, then it’d be the others, but it just prevents fuel from igniting at the wrong time.
<span>
Homo Ergaster and Homo Habilis
</span>
Well, one big benefit would more than likely be that if you have a strike and you go on for a long time and stop working your boss is going to give you what you want. They may not give you everything but they will more than likely give you most of your demands. But one big danger would be facing the fact of being fired. If you don't work and you go on strike you could be facing the fact of being fired. With this being said I personally think that this isn't a solution that people should go to because it can be dangerous because it can lead to death or the loss of a job.
I hope this helps!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Please mark me as Brainiest
Answer:
A parent would allow their child to work in dangerous conditions if they needed the child's payment money to help keep the family afloat and be able to provide for their families.
Explanation:
It makes sense because in third world countries companies such as Nike were using child labor to make their products and they only get payed about an $1 a day. In order to live adequately you need at least $3 a day, so they were using the kids to help with financial problems.
The immediate cause was because President Carter decided to allow Iran's desposed Shah into America so he could receive cancer treatment.
