The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The culture I identify the most is the Mexican culture. The traditions specific to that culture that have the most meaning for me is the respect for the family union, the role the mother plays in the Mexican family nucleus, the friendly and camaraderie of its people, and the thousands of years of history since the Mesoamerican times.
Mexico is a colorful country whose people can be traced back to the Toltecs, Olmecs, Aztecs, and Mayan civilization. Thousands of years of history, culture, customs, and tradition. The food is awesome. Every region of the country has different types of food to the degree that the diversity of Mexican food has been rewarded as a historical patrimony of humanity by UNESCO.
Mexico has beautiful touristic places, incredible beaches, archeological sites, colonial towns, modern cities, and business centers.
The USS Maddox incident, drew the U.S. more directly into the Vietnam War. Which involved <span>two separate confrontations involving North Vietnam and the United States in the waters of the Gulf of Tonkin.</span>
Answer:
Great Zimbabwe is believed to have served as a royal palace for the local monarch. As such, it would have been used as the seat of political power. Among the edifice's most prominent features were its walls, some of which are eleven meters high.
Explanation:
Great Zimbabwe is believed to have served as a royal palace for the local monarch. As such, it would have been used as the seat of political power. Among the edifice's most prominent features were its walls, some of which are eleven meters high.
Should be C because if you do process of elimination the others dont make sense like everyone born during th 1880 but i remember learning about the young turks during world war 2 but no earlier than that,B it cant be that one and D kind of doesnt make sense so its C
Answer:
B
Explanation:
The Nullification crisis was a debate in 1832, over the south declaring tariffs from the north, unconstitutional. Both sides had a different viewpoint on state's rights towards the debate, causing the debate in the first place.