1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
algol [13]
3 years ago
8

What do megaliths imply about the northern European civilizations that build them?

History
1 answer:
Degger [83]3 years ago
5 0
There are many things one can infer from these civilizations just by knowing that they were able to build such massive structures. One was that they had a running civilization which was able to provide for its citizens in adeqaute amount - this allowed them to be able to undertake such feats. 

Another thing is that we know they had the necessary knowledge to actually build such structures - this tells us that they were relatively advanced for their age and time. 

Another thing we can know from this is that they probably valued some sort of rituals and had people who were at a higher level in society who also commanded for these structures to be built. 
You might be interested in
Explain MacMillan's conclusion that Wilson "remained a Southerner in some ways all his life." Describe how Wilson's background a
Murljashka [212]

Answer:

paki basa nalng .

Explanation:

On December 4, 1918, the George Washington sailed out of New York with the American delegation to the Peace Conference on board. Guns fired salutes, crowds along the waterfront cheered, tugboats hooted and Army planes and dirigibles circled overhead. Robert Lansing, the American secretary of state, released carrier pigeons with messages to his relatives about his deep hope for a lasting peace. The ship, a former German passenger liner, slid out past the Statue of Liberty to the Atlantic, where an escort of destroyers and battleships stood by to accompany it and its cargo of heavy expectations to Europe.

On board were the best available experts, combed out of the universities and the government; crates of reference materials and special studies; the French and Italian ambassadors to the United States; and Woodrow Wilson. No other American president had ever gone to Europe while in office. His opponents accused him of breaking the Constitution; even his supporters felt he might be unwise. Would he lose his great moral authority by getting down to the hurly-burly of negotiations? Wilson's own view was clear: the making of the peace was as important as the winning of the war. He owed it to the peoples of Europe, who were crying out for a better world. He owed it to the American servicemen. "It is now my duty," he told a pensive Congress just before he left, "to play my full part in making good what they gave their life's blood to obtain." A British diplomat was more cynical; Wilson, he said, was drawn to Paris "as a debutante is entranced by the prospect of her first ball."

Wilson expected, he wrote to his great friend Edward House, who was already in Europe, that he would stay only to arrange the main outlines of the peace settlements. It was not likely that he would remain for the formal Peace Conference with the enemy. He was wrong. The preliminary conference turned, without anyone's intending it, into the final one, and Wilson stayed for most of the crucial six months between January and June 1919. The question of whether or not he should have gone to Paris, which exercised so many of his contemporaries, now seems unimportant. From Franklin Roosevelt at Yalta to Jimmy Carter or Bill Clinton at Camp David, American presidents have sat down to draw borders and hammer out peace agreements. Wilson had set the conditions for the armistices which ended the Great War. Why should he not make the peace as well?

Although he had not started out in 1912 as a foreign policy president, circumstances and his own progressive political principles had drawn him outward. Like many of his compatriots, he had come to see the Great War as a struggle between the forces of democracy, however imperfectly represented by Britain and France, and those of reaction and militarism, represented all too well by Germany and Austria-Hungary. Germany's sack of Belgium, its unrestricted submarine warfare and its audacity in attempting to entice Mexico into waging war on the United States had pushed Wilson and American public opinion toward the Allies. When Russia had a democratic revolution in February 1917, one of the last reservations that the Allies included an autocracy vanished. Although he had campaigned in 1916 on a platform of keeping the country neutral, Wilson brought the United States into the war in April 1917. He was convinced that he was doing the right thing. This was important to the son of a Presbyterian minister, who shared his father's deep religious conviction, if not his calling.

Wilson was born in Virginia in 1856, just before the Civil War. Although he remained a Southerner in some ways all his life in his insistence on honor and his paternalistic attitudes toward women and blacks he also accepted the war's outcome. Abraham Lincoln was one of his great heroes, along with Edmund Burke and William Gladstone. The young Wilson was at once highly idealistic and intensely ambitious. After four very happy years at Princeton and an unhappy stint as a lawyer, he found his first career in teaching and writing. By 1890 he was back at Princeton, a star member of the faculty. In 1902 he became its president, supported virtually unanimously by the trustees, faculty and students.

6 0
2 years ago
What role did social rank and occupation play in the growing democratization of American politics what was the reaction in New Y
IrinaVladis [17]
<span>Social rank and occupation played a role because land owners had the largest say in government in colonial America. The were the wealthiest, and they made all of the decisions. Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. </span>
7 0
3 years ago
How did Ivan the Terrible deal with his enemies during his “bad period”?
9966 [12]
During his bad period, Ivan the Terrible organized a secret police who killed everyone whom he thought might be a traitor.

Ivan the Terrible came to the throne in 1533. He was named Ivan the Terrible because he ruled by terror. This happened after his wife died. However, he also reformed Russia during his good years.
3 0
3 years ago
A "naturalized" U.S. citizen
Hunter-Best [27]
D: completed a citizenship process

After serving in the military, even for 5 years, you still have to apply for naturalization and get approved in order to naturalize through military work. You must also meet a lot of requirements beyond your military service to be eligible.
There is no citizenship contest.
Being born in the United States automatically makes you a citizen, you do not need to be naturalized.
D is the only answer that upon completion makes you a naturalized citizen because you have gone through the process of naturalization.
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How was prohibition repealed in the state of Oklahoma?
Dafna1 [17]

The prohibition was repealed in the state of Oklahoma by the federal government passed a law repealing it.

Answer: Option A

<u>Explanation:</u>

The Oklahoma Enabling Act permitted the state of Oklahoma to form a "dispensary" or alcoholic drink agency in order to handle the alcohol sale for the purposes of medicine.

Thereby, when prohibition was put nationwide, it was repealed and included in the 18th amendment, 1933 Though none moderated in Oklahoma.

On 5th December 1933, Twenty First Amendment was made to the Constitution of United States of America and the repeal of prohibition was accomplished. Although, Oklahoma wasn't the only “dry” state.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • what is an enumerated power of congress? a power specifically named in the constitution a power given to it by the supreme court
    7·1 answer
  • Which settlement does the colored region of the map depict? New Spain in 1750 New France in 1750 New France in 1500 New Spain in
    11·2 answers
  • In India, what was Gandhi’s original focus to fight against?
    12·1 answer
  • Describe the consequences of westward expansion on the following minority groups.
    8·2 answers
  • Which first plan for government in the United States had no executive branch?
    8·1 answer
  • Explain why sectionalism was so widespread in the southern states?
    9·1 answer
  • What was the magic number for the time day and month the war ended
    15·1 answer
  • What was the compromise of 1877?​
    15·1 answer
  • Why was the Constitutional Convention necessary?
    12·1 answer
  • What was the main purpose of NAFTA?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!