It’s B, because if you think about it it’s the only one that make sense
They are more likely to be true, and they came from someone who experienced first hand what happened
For Lincoln, allowing American democracy to succeed was compatible with the ideal of freedom; allowing secessionists to destroy it (in response to a democratic election) was not. In other words, Lincoln did not believe that true freedom was letting states do their own thing--and letting the pillars of American constitutional democracy run amok--but instead, in maintaining a union where the great experiment of democracy could flourish. As Lincoln himself said quite clearly in the Gettysburg Address, he was committed to making sure "...that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth." I suppose you can argue that Lincoln's vision of freedom was not worth the price, but you cannot deny that he had a vision of freedom--and that, for him, this vision was compatible with maintaining the historic, unprecedented political freedom that was achieved in 1776.
Answer:
Confederate soldiers sometimes fought because they feared Union victory would result in a society where black people were placed on an even footing with whites. The large majority of Civil War soldiers were native born.
Explanation:
<u>Which document was completed in 1787?</u>
<em>Constitution</em>
The <u>Constitution of the United States</u> was signed on <u>September 17, 1787,</u> and settled the main principles of government in the country. Throughout the same year, members of the Constitutional Convention reunited to revise and debate over the <u>Articles of Federation</u>, ultimately deciding a new constitution that would establish a new type of government.
