Police violence should be the best answer. There are all types of marchers, marching for different things. There would only be a lack of support from other citizens if those marches weren’t agreed with by the majority, basically saying that some marches had support from others. A repeal of voting legislation is definitely not the answer, as a march is not enough to strip someone’s voting rights away, no matter what time period we’re speaking of. A lack of nation television coverage could be a near answer, as some marches may be seen unimportant and therefore not being televised. But as the question directs to marchers experiences, and not a certain march, this wouldn’t be right. By using order of elimination, the only available, and reasonable answer would be police violence, as many marches are seen as public disorder, and therefore treated by the law. Most of the time, these marches are made to disrupt, and polices mostly respond with brutality or brute.
Letter A is the correct answer.
When President Franklin Roosevelt established the Rural Electrification Administration under the Emergency Relief Appropriation Act of 1935, many rural farmers had access to electricity through newly erected power lines. At the time the law was passed, electricity was commonplace in urban areas but not as common in rural places.
Two issues that arose in the convention of Philadelphia were due to slavery, and whether or not slaves should be considered a part of the total population. The three fifths compromise counted them as 3/5 of a person for the purposes of determining a state's level of taxation and representation.
