1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sliva [168]
3 years ago
5

When Max's father installed a new ceiling fan in his room, the "whirring" sound initially disturbed Max's sleep. After a few nig

hts, however, Max was back to sleeping normally, as if the fan did not bother him at all. Max's filtering out of the fan's noise is best described as ____.a. attentionb. habituationc. mental hardwared. mental software
Social Studies
1 answer:
Rzqust [24]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: b. habituation

Explanation:

Habituation is a psychological learning process that is described as a decrement in the response to a specific stimulus after being regularly exposed to it. It´s associated with the nervous system and may happen unconsciously. In this example, Max filtering out the fan's noise that was previously so distracting is an effect of habituation.

You might be interested in
Which of the following
abruzzese [7]
The answer is flavian
4 0
2 years ago
identify another theme in "the people could fly". how is this theme developed over the course of the text.
ivolga24 [154]
Oh gosh lol was so mad oh okie so cute ☺️
6 0
2 years ago
What is a coordinate
Solnce55 [7]
Either of the two lines if latitude and longitude whose intersection determines the geographical point of a place.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are the responsibilities of renter versus an owner
sesenic [268]

An owner is usually responsible for large scale repairs of a unit as well as the obligations of the unit to the city and state in the form of property taxes.

A renter is responsible for keeping the unit in the same condition that it was handed to them by the owner.

3 0
2 years ago
How has the United Kingdom maintained an important role in world affairs
kenny6666 [7]

The UK's world role: Great Britain's greatness fixation

Editorial

Mon 25 Jan 2010 00.05 GMT First published on Mon 25 Jan 2010 00.05 GMT

Shares

3

Comments

130

In some eyes, but most notably its own, the British government will be in the driving seat of world events this week. Today, G7 finance ministers will be in London to discuss inter­national banking reform and the transaction tax, and – in the claim that the City minister, Paul Myners, makes on our comment pages today – the UK will be "leading international efforts". On Wednesday, diplomats from around the world will meet here to discuss the threat to Yemen from al-Qaida. A day later, attention shifts to another international conference in London, this time on the imperilled future of Afghanistan. Quite a week.

Every country likes to be taken seriously around the world. Lots of nations like to feel they are punching their weight, or even above it. Only a few, however, seem to feel the need to promote themselves as the one the others all look to for leadership. It is one thing – though never uncontroversial, and in some contexts increasingly implausible – for the United States to see itself in this role. As the world's largest economic and military power, the US remains even now the necessary nation in international affairs. It is quite another thing for Britain to pretend to such a status.

Advertisement

The continuing pre-eminence of American clout has been starkly shown by what has happened in banking over the last several days. Domestic political pressures spurred President Obama into declaring a war on the money men, and markets worldwide immediately trembled, as they grasped that his plan could unleash a global drive to split retail and investment banking. There should be no shame for London in wholeheartedly welcoming the initiative while admitting that Britain could never have made such a move on its own. Instead, however, the government carries on as if its own detailed plans for banks' living wills, and its distant dreams of a Tobin tax, are framing the debate.

Britain is a very important country. The sixth-largest economy in the world. The fifth-largest military power. Its claim to what the former prime minister Lord Home used to call a seat at the top table is beyond dispute, though it would be a still more influential one if we sometimes ceded it to the European Union. And yet, more than half a century after the loss of empire, our political culture still seems racked by the need to be the leading nation, not just one of them. Such delusions are most associated with the political right, but Gordon Brown can also seem peculiarly ensnared by them. His Britain must always be first, always at the forefront, must always show the way to the rest. Even in the G7, the G8 or the G20 – never mind the UN – a mere share of the action is never enough, and it must always be Britain that is leading the effort, whether in Yemen or Afghanistan. But this way hubris lies. Mr Brown immodestly let slip to MPs in 2008 that he had saved the world. And as he arrived in Copenhagen for the ill-fated climate change summit last month he announced that "There are many outstanding issues which I'm here to resolve."

In reality, of course, no single nation can resolve the world's problems alone. Only the United States and China, separately or together, can even aspire to set the agenda for the rest. If the US raises its commitment to Afghanistan then other nations are likely to follow. If the US penalises the banks, others soon fall into line.

Britain has no such potency. Yet we still struggle to adjust to our reality. We can propose, as we shall be doing in three important London meetings this week, but we cannot dispose. Every day, the descant of the Chilcot inquiry reminds us of where the refusal to recognise this truth can humiliatingly lead. Our national interest should be to play our important role as a true, trusted and committed European partner on the world stage. No longer the greatest. Just one great among others. Good enough ought to be good enough. The people get it. If only the politicians did too.


7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why was adding amendments to the Constitution made a difficult task? Because it should be a needed change to add. 2. Because the
    13·2 answers
  • In "the nexus of language, communication and culture", according to sherzer (1987), ___________ refers to a group of individuals
    8·1 answer
  • What seems to happen to confessed witches
    11·1 answer
  • Wich accurately describes FEMA​
    8·2 answers
  • Use the drop-down menu to complete the sentence.
    7·1 answer
  • Which amendment protects Americans' right to "keep and bear arms"?
    6·2 answers
  • The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission issues a statement describing how it will apply a section of the Americans with Disa
    9·1 answer
  • Price discrimination occurs when people are charged_
    11·1 answer
  • Why are successful campaigners stereotypically looked at as if they would be 'good presidents' ?
    14·1 answer
  • In what forms is fresh water found on the earth?​
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!