Answer:
a. The Equal Protection Clause is a clause from the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause provides that "nor shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act.
While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings.
b. In the case of Easley v. Cromartie, an appeal from the decision given in hunt v. Cromartie was filed in the supreme court of the United States by Easley. In hunt v. Cromartie, the court held that the legislature of North Carolina did not use the factor of race while drawing the boundaries in the twelfth congressional district,1992. It was held by the court that the legislature did not violate the equal protection clause of the constitution and no evidence to prove that legislature set its boundaries on a racial basis rather than a political basis.
In Easley v Cromartie the appeal was that drawing the boundaries for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The supreme court of the United States held that the decision of the district court is erroneous because it actually relied upon racial factors and this is not in the interest of the state.
In Shaw v. Reno the court concluded that the plan of North Carolina tried to segregate the voters on the basis of race.
Answer: Public Expenditure.
Explanation: The authorization of public expenditure is the accounting operation that reflects the act, by virtue of which, the competent authority to manage an expense from a credit agrees to perform it, determining its amount in a certain way or as closely as possible, when it cannot be done in a certain way, reserving, for that purpose, all or part of the budgeted loan.
Answer:
A, the reason is because the area is dominated by these religious groups, NOT ethnicities.
Answer:
Value-expressive function of attitudes.
Explanation:
The value-expressive function of attitudes refers to attitudes that express core values and self-knowledge of the individual. Thus, the value-expressive function establishes one's self-identity and confirms the notion of what kind of person the individual wants to be.
The value-expressive function has allowed Alexa to discover that she is a person who loves animals and wants to protect them, and this function has shown Alexa that she is the type of person who wants to fight for animal rights because they are weaker and need someone to fight for them.
