<span>There is some truth to
this myth backed up by science explanation. A snake’s nervous system will still
be functional for approximately 10 to 12 hours after they are pronounced dead.
So probably that is where the myth or saying “a snake wont die til the sun goes
down” came from. Because 10 to 12 hours is enough time from the morning for the
sun to set down, and the nervous system will be completely dysfunctional and
only will be then that the snake is truly dead. So the best way to ensure the
snake does not bite you or attack you is to kill it, cut off its head and bury
it so that its nervous system will be readily dysfunctional.</span>
Explanation:
I could not find the article that is missing in your question but I will tell you something more about the author's bias in the literature work so you can find it by yourself.
- Authors are not always having fair thinking about something, they also can have many mistakes in their thinking patterns or wrong choices. They can make it also on purpose or it could be just their natural thinking.
A bias is representing those unfair presentations of some events or situations in literature. They are having their point of view that isn't always matching our expectations. If you want to find the author's bias in your article you must find first what is the way that he looks at certain situations or feelings.
Answer:
The great depression affected Americans by leaving many unemployed, which caused widespread poverty and homelessness. This also caused families to be separated while looking for jobs. Suffering from droughts in the Midwest, farmers were unable to pay for their settlements and leave. The New Deal affected mostly Native Americans. The 1887 Dawes Act had torn apart the Native's tribal lands and John Collier, the New Deals Commissioner of Indian Affairs knew the Dawes Act at the time, would leave the Natives landless . To prevent this from happening, Collier developed the Indian New Deal.
The king structure or organize his speech by using a topic sentence followed by evidence and examples. Each section integrates his ideas and advances his arguments by stating a claim and backing it up with facts and personal testimonies. The king structure uses a topic followed by examples and evidence.
