<span>The difference may lie in the project life, sometimes referenced as the planning horizon. A project may have a large internal rate of return (irr), but a very short project life. A second project might have a lower irr, but a much longer life. In that case, the second project will return less per year, but will provide a return for many more years, resulting in a higher pw.</span>
Answer:
build brand loyalty
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that the Cory's final goal in this scenario is to build brand loyalty. This term refers to when customers decide to purchase a brand's product over other competitor's products due to them having had great purchasing experiences with that company.
Answer:
December 31, year 9
Explanation:
Here, we want to state that date that is possible for Milo to acquire qualified replacement property.
In order to avoid being taxed on a gain resulting from an involuntary conversion, the property subject to the conversion must be replaced within a specified time, measured from the end of the calendar year in which the proceeds are received.
Generally, the period is 2 years, but it is 3 years when the involuntary conversion results from government condemnation or eminent domain and is extended to 4 years when the loss is in connection with a declared federal disaster area.
We are told from the question that Milo received the recovery on January 2, Year 5, the property would have to be replaced within 4 years from the end of Year 5 or by December 31, Year 9
It could invade the privacy of the shopper when trying things on. All of the actions the customer does is being recorded, not to mention the customer has no idea who exactly is monitoring the cameras, and how many people have access to it. It could become a serious problem.
Answer:
a) safety stock = z-score x √lead time x standard deviation of demand
z-score for 99.9% = 3.29053
√lead time = √7 = 2.6458
standard deviation of demand = 3
safety stock = 3.29053 x 2.6458 x 3 = 26.12 ≈ 26 soaps
reorder point = lead time demand + safety stock = (7 x 16) + 26 = 138 soaps
EOQ = √[(2 x S x D) / H]
S = order cost = $10
D = annual demand = 16 x 365 = 5,840
H = $0.05
EOQ = √[(2 x $10 x 5,840) / $0.05] = 1,528.40 ≈ 1,528 soaps
b) total order costs per year = (5,840 / 1,528) x $10 = $38.22
total holding costs = (1,528 / 2) x $0.05 = $38.20
total annual ordering and holding costs = $76.42
