Based on the given scenario, it can be concluded that a legally binding contract was concluded between X and Y.
This is because, before the agreed date of 20th August, X withdrew her acceptance and sent it by post and also made a call to Y which informed him of her current stance.
<h3>What is a Contract?</h3>
This refers to the legally binding agreement that exists between two or more people about the terms of something.
Hence, we can see that based on the given scenario, it can be concluded that a legally binding contract was concluded between X and Y.
Notwithstanding the arrival of the postal letter of acceptance, this is considered void as there has been a change of terms that have been clearly communicated to the other party.
Read more about contract here:
brainly.com/question/984979
#SPJ1
Answer:
Who is Leonard Gordon Goodman
Explanation:
Answer:
free speech under the First Amendment of the Constitution
. ... The trial took place in 1960, in a segregated court room in Montgomery, before a white judge and all-white jury
Explanation:
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court ruling that the freedom of speech protections in the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution restrict the ability of American public officials to sue for defamation.
The United States Supreme Court ruled unanimously on March 9, 1964, in The New York Times v. Sullivan that the Constitution prohibits a public official from recovering damages for a defamatory falsehood related to his official conduct. ... Sullivan, he was in favor of an entirely different approach to libel.
Sidelights: These red and green lights are called sidelights (or combination lights) because they are visible to another vessel approaching from the side or head-on. The red light indicates a vessel's port (left) side; the green indicates a vessel's starboard (right) side.