What is Katz argument: The Court ruled that Katz was entitled to Fourth Amendment protection for his conversations and that a physical intrusion into the area he occupied was unnecessary to bring the Amendment into play. "The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places," wrote Justice Potter Stewart for the Court.
What is the Katz v United States holding: The Court ruled that Katz was entitled to Fourth Amendment protection for his conversations and that a physical intrusion into the area he occupied was unnecessary to bring the Amendment into play. "The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places," wrote Justice Potter Stewart for the Court.
The trial court must find a witness in order to sustain the defendant's Sixth Amendment claim.
<h3>
Sixth Amendment Claim</h3>
- The rights of criminal defendants are guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment, including the right to an impartial jury, the right to an impartial judge, the right to a public trial without undue delay, and the right to know your accusers and the details of the allegations and evidence against you.
- It has been put to the test most visibly in a number of cases concerning terrorism, but it appears much more frequently in matters requiring, for instance, jury selection or witness protection.
- The accused has the legal right to a quick and open trial by an impartial jury of the state and district where the offense was committed, such district shall have been determined in advance by law, in all criminal cases.
To learn more about the Sixth Amendment Claim refer to:
brainly.com/question/905718
#SPJ4
Answer:
hey yo!
Explanation:
What do you need? (Sarcasm)
Answer:
A is the right answer that you're looking for ;)
