1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AveGali [126]
2 years ago
15

A "nativist" of the late-1800s would have been MOST likely to support

History
2 answers:
tatuchka [14]2 years ago
6 0

C. a ban on immigration to the united states

melomori [17]2 years ago
4 0
The correct answer is C.
Nativism is the usually seen as the scholarly term for what is more commonly described as anti-immigration stance. The nativism is political view that favors the native inhabitants and supports heir interests instead of those of the immigrants. In 1800's the nativists would most likely support the Chinese Exclusion Act. The nativists see themselves as patriots and for them the term nativism is a derogatory term.
You might be interested in
What were the changes that were made to heritage day in South Africa <br>​
JulsSmile [24]

Answer:

On 16 December 1995 the name was changed once more and was celebrated as a public holiday known as the Day of Reconciliation. The establishment of December 16 as a public holiday was an attempt to strike a balance between a divided past and promoting national unity and reconciliation in a new political dispensation.27 Aug 2019

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What issue lead from texas seceding from the union
Romashka [77]

In 1860, following the election of President Abraham Lincoln (in favor of the abolition of slavery), the public opinion of the deep south of the United States was oriented towards secession. In February 1861, six southern states had adopted a decree of secession (Ordinance of Secession, a document that formally sanctioned secession from the United States).

On January 21, 1861, Texas Governor Sam Houston called a Texas parliament meeting in Austin and, after describing Lincoln's "wretched" election, tried to avoid secession. However, on 1 February the Texan parliament proclaimed secession from the Union with a majority of 166 to 7. On February 23, the decision was confirmed by a referendum approved with a majority of 46.129 votes against 14.697.

It was therefore decided to withdraw the order of July 4, 1845 with which Texas had ratified the annexation to the United States by adhering to its Constitution and the relations and obligations to the federal government were revoked.

Finally, it was decided to appoint a delegation that would represent the state of Texas in Montgomery (Alabama) where representatives of the other six secessionist states were gathering to form the Confederacy.

Governor Houston accepted secession but pressed for Texas to return to an independent and neutral state. On March 16th the swearing ceremony of loyalty to the confederation was held. Houston refused to swear three times and was therefore dismissed.

Once Houston was dismissed, in the winter of 1861, representatives of the Texas counties adopted a secession decree by a majority of 166 votes to 8. A declaration was also approved that explained the causes of the secession including: solidarity towards the slave-holding States, and the inability of the federal government to prevent the attacks of Native Americans and bands of outlaws.

6 0
3 years ago
How do sources help us to learn about the past?
DedPeter [7]
Primary sources help us learn about people in the past because you are learning about events that occurred from people that were there to actually witness it. You get first-hand information passed to you whether it's via your grandparents, a journal, or a letter. From primary sources you can also learn about the ways people lives were. You are informed about their culture, religion, foods, and clothing. Differing from secondary sources, you are not reading or listening to information about the past, or even present, that is biased and has edited or opinionated information included.
3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following caused more children to spend less time working in factories
Dmitriy789 [7]

Ten Hours Act of 1847- This set a 10 hour working day for women and for children younger than 18. Since this included most workers, factory owners extended this to everyone.

Factory Act of 1802-Shortened work hours and  Improved conditions for children working in cotton mills

7 0
2 years ago
If the Great War were to start in 2021 who would be on what side?
Likurg_2 [28]

Answer:

<h2>please give me a free brainiest points</h2>

Explanation:

30 Answers. 2021 will end with unbelievable death with over 62 million people all dying from this one event and 300 million more over the next 5 years. I promise you this is real and it is the end of the world for these people. The event is called life and the world ends for millions each year.

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did some Southern states respond to the Brown v. Board decision?
    11·2 answers
  • A colonial advantage at the beginning of the American Revolution was
    13·2 answers
  • What form of government did Benito Mussolini run while leading Italy?he Russian Revolution of 1917 was led by .
    11·1 answer
  • In 1991, the United States began Operation Desert Storm, a military action against the country of Iraq. The U.S. again fought Ir
    11·2 answers
  • Did Europeans treat African fairly
    14·1 answer
  • Read this excerpt about a Viking invasion in England. As [the Vikings] were going to their ships, the English army should have c
    15·2 answers
  • Why is the industrail revolution a game changer in world history​
    5·1 answer
  • 2
    14·1 answer
  • The Sugar Act of 1764 was a tax on molasses and to fight paying that tax, the colonists
    10·1 answer
  • 1) why did England have an "unfavorable balance of trade" with China?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!