3a. Jackson's gross pay for 40 hours is
(40 h)×($12.20/h) = $488.00
3b. An equation for Jackson's pay could be
372.10 = h×12.20
This can be solved for h by dividing by 12.20
372.10/12.20 = h = 30.5
Jackson worked 30.5 hours last week.
3c. The total of hours shown is
(8) + (7 1/4) + (8 1/2) = (8 +7 +8) +(0.25 +0.50) = 23.75
The number of hours missing is the difference between this number and the hours found in part (b).
30.50 - 23.75 = 6.75
There are 6 3/4 hours missing from Jackson's time sheet for last week. This is less than a full day's work, so seems reasonable.
_____
Of course, you know the decimal - fraction conversions:
1/4 = 0.25
1/2 = 0.50
3/4 = 0.75
Well three seats in the right with 24 seats means there is 8 rows. I assume the same for the left. So 2x8=16. Sixteen Seats on the left. This is my theory. Though options would be nice.
Answer:
3
Step-by-step explanation:
And,
$ \sum (2i+1)= \sum (2i)+ \sum_{i=1} ^{4} (1) $
$=\sum_{i=1} ^{4}(2i) + 1+1+1+1 $
$=\boxed{\Big(\sum_{n=1} ^{4}(2n)\Big) +4}.... \text{Variable in Summation doesn't matter}$
Hence the difference is 3.
Answer:
Tonya proof is correct
and Pearl proof is wrong
Step-by-step explanation:
AKL and GKB are obviously congruent. But the reasons given are different, One of the justification is Vertical Angles Theorem, and the other is Adjacent Angles.
But the correct justification is the Vertical Angles Theorem, because the angles are Vertically away from each other, or the angles are at opposite sides of each other. Which is when Vertical Angles Theorem is applied.
Making Tonya correct since that was the answer he given.
The definition of Adjacent Angles is incorrect, this Theorem is used when the angles are Adjacent to each other. When the angles are on the same line as the other angle, is when the definition of Adjacent Angles is applied. Not in this situation
Answer:
7672.50
Step-by-step explanation:
7500×0.23%=17.25
17.25×10=172.50
7500+172.50=7672.50
