Answer:
A mid-ocean ridge separates the Pacific plate and the Nazca plate off the western coast of South America. Which statement best describes the relative motions of the Pacific and Nazca plates? The Pacific plate is moving to the east, and the Nazca plate is moving to the west.
Answer:
I'm not sure i can understand that passage
Answer:
b. stratigraphically alternating sequences of sandstones, conglomerates, and shales.
Explanation:
It is unlikely that one would find igneous rocks such as basalt and granite in fluvial environments. Coal is also not usually found in fluvial environments. Limestone prefers shallow and calm waters so would not be moved by water normally. This therefore invalidates options a, c, d, e and f.
For the hypothesis to be true, one would need to find conglomerates as these contain large clasts and are present in fluvial environments. Alternating sequences involving conglomerates and sandstones would indeed show that that some floods were able to carry large clasts.
Answer:
Because the Netherlands depends mostly on Foreign Trade's than the US.
Explanation:
The US is a major "home" producer, and can maintain itself semi-well without foreign trading. The US still benefits from International trading though.
Since the Netherlands isn't as nutrient rich as the US, it has to depend mostly on foreign trading.
