The best way to make an effective arguments is to use one or more of three strategies: ethos, pathos, and logos. Logos uses logic and reasoning, pathos appeals to the emotions, and ethos appeals to character, like the credibility of the author. So think about each of these and then use your text to try to find which one or more the author uses.
Hopefully this helps :)
Hi. You did not submit the sample that the question refers to, nor did you submit your answer. This makes it impossible for this question to be answered. However, I will try to help you as best I can.
Your question asks you to compare your answer with a model answer. You don't show the context these two answers are related to, so you should look for that context in your paper. It is likely that these answers are related to the previous question.
To make the comparison you should note which elements these questions have similar or equal and how they complement each other. The more similar, the more complementary the two answers are. If the two answers do not complement each other, nor do they have any similar elements, it means that they are completely different.
Answer:
active I Believe hope this helps
Answer:
D. why the driver's license age should be changed
Explanation:
Many teenagers love to drive around. In the USA, you get your learners permit at 16, and your license at 17. I think it would be reasonable if teens can get their learners' permit at 15, and their license by 16.
Hope this helps! :)
Although your question does not give very much context regarding what was happening in that specific piece of literature,
The idea that nearby women were making fun of/snickering at the protagonist in the text suggests that she is not well-liked. It also could suggest that the women who were snickering are the antagonists/ are mean to her.
