Yes I think they can, if they are trying to agree on moral matters in "Public Policy" I don't see why religion would have to play a part in the discussion
Answer:
Explanation:
1. Which statement best describes how to determine if a source is reliable?
d) Determine whether the author is credible, unbiased, and supported by evidence.
2. Reagan’s vow to reduce government spending was particularly damaging to social programs. In spite of this, the president did make some concessions. To which of the following social programs did the Reagan administration increase spending?
b) The Department of Veterans Affairs
3. What was the impact of Reagan’s firing the air traffic controllers?
c) Labor unions deteriorated as employers fired striking workers and replaced them.
4. Which of the following was a change in economic policy resulting from the election of Ronald Reagan?
c) People making more than a certain amount received tax cuts
This is called "strict constructionism".
It means that the federal government should apply only what is written in the Constitution and in the way that it is written. There would be no searching for hidden meanings or anything similar.
Your answer is A!
they wanted to preserve their ethnic identity!
I hope this helped!
if you have any further questions, please feel free to private message me!
