Answer:
Explanation:
Get in touch with your local Jehovah's Witness branch. They can give you an earful on this subject.
They have religious reasons for objecting to transfusions. When it comes to children, the courts have overruled them saying that the welfare of the child is more important than any medical objection or argument that the witnesses may have.
People with Leukemia at some point in course of their disease, may need a transfusion. Nothing else will do. The cells in blood fight foreign antibodies and transport oxygen to organs that need it. If a patient's own blood can't do it, then a transfusion becomes necessary.
The courts have a right to dictate terms when children are involved. The courts do not have the same right with adults. If an adult chooses to end the suffering, they have that right. There even comes a point (in Canada at least) where death is an option. But an individual patient must give knowledgeable consent to taking his own life.
So medicine has a say in some things and not in others. In the United States, the population has not given up on the rights of the 1st amendment. And medicine can override even those rights.
It is a true statement that the three-fifths compromise lasted until the fourteenth amendment declared that everyone would be counted as a whole person.
<h3>
What was the three-fifths compromise?</h3>
It was the compromise agreement between delegates from the North and South at the Constitutional Convention (1787) that the three-fifths of the slave population would be counted for determining direct taxation and representation in the House of Representatives.
However, this method of counting 3/5 of slaves for determining direct taxation and representation in the House of Representatives lasted until the fourteenth amendment declared that everyone would be counted as a whole person.
Read more about three-fifths compromise
brainly.com/question/535544
#SPJ1
I believe the answer is: Accommodation
According to piaget, accommodation refers to the process of adding new information into an existing Schema.
This happen when someone decided to update their old memories when facing with a contradictory one rather than completely change it into a new one.
The correct answer is that "<span>has lost his anonymity.".
Shane was anonymous to the woman, who was carrying a large bag of groceries, until the bag fell and the woman looked at Shane directly and asked for help. In that scenario, when the woman looked at Shane and asked for help, Shane helped the woman since his anonymity </span>disappeared, when the woman noticed him and asked for his help.
