Answer:26
Step-by-step explanation:
85*2=170
170+64+x=360
234+x=360
x=126
Answer:
x=5.6
y=-5.6
Step-by-step explanation:
3x - 5y = 14 Equation 1
– 2x + 2y = 0 Equation 2
Simultaneous equation can be solved either through elimination method or substitution method. But we use elimination method for this question
Multiply equation 1 by -2 (the coefficient of x in equation 2) and multiply equation 2 with 3 (the coefficient of x in equation 1), so that x will have the same coefficient in the new equations, and easy to eliminate
-2(3x - 5y = 14)
-6x+10y=-28 Equation 3
3(– 2x + 2y = 0)
-6x+6y=0 Equation 4
Subtract equation 4 from 3 to eliminate x
-6x+10y=-28
-6x+6y=0
-6x-(-6x)=-6x+6x=0
10y-6y=5y
-28-0=-28
5y=-28
y=-28/5
y=-5.6
Substitute for y in equation 2
– 2x + 2y = 0
– 2x + 2(-5.6) = 0
-2x-11.2=0
-2x=11.2
x=-11.2/2
x=5.6
Answer:
d. H0:
vs.
Step-by-step explanation:
A hypothesis is defined as "a speculation or theory based on insufficient evidence that lends itself to further testing and experimentation. With further testing, a hypothesis can usually be proven true or false".
The null hypothesis is defined as "a hypothesis that says there is no statistical significance between the two variables in the hypothesis. It is the hypothesis that the researcher is trying to disprove".
The alternative hypothesis is "just the inverse, or opposite, of the null hypothesis. It is the hypothesis that researcher is trying to prove".
On this case the Management try to determine if there is a difference in the average investment/quad between using electricity and using gas. So this needs to be on the alternative hypothesis. And the complement of the alternative hypothesis would be on the null hypothesis.
Null hypothesis :
Alternative hypothesis:
Or equivalently:
Null hypothesis :
Alternative hypothesis:
Other important thing is that on the alternative hypothesis we never can have the symbol equal.
So on this case the best options is:
d. H0:
vs.
Answer:
−1 > x > −3
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's solve your inequality step-by-step.
8<3−5x<18
Answer: Running speed is 10k/h
Biking speed is 50k/h
Step-by-step explanation:
My procedure may be unconventional, but it works:
Compute the time it takes, then translate to speed. 25k at biking speed takes 2 hours less than at running speed which is 1/5 bike speed.
Distance/speed = time 25/x=25/(5x-2) cross multiply divisors
25(5x-2) = 25x ==> 125x -50 =25x ==> 100x = 50
x = 0.5 hours at biking speed 25k/0.5h = 50k/h
Running speed = 50/5 10k/h
Proof: 25k/ 10k/h = 2.5 hours
25k /50k/h = 0.5 hours
2.5 h - .5 h = 2 hours, the difference stated in the question.