If I was an ordinary person in my 1930s and aged 40 with a middle income job such as an 'office assistant', I would not be in favour of helping other countries.
I would personally prefer a policy of isolation from the rest of the world. Primarily, this would be because I had seen with my very won eyes, the death and destruction bought on by World War I and more importantly the Great Depression.
With millions of job less people, poverty and people barely making ends meet, I would want our government to concentrate on the welfare of our own people, rather than go to war with countries thousands of miles away.
Answer:
What is a perfect union?
A flawless union, one where all races join
higher ups mingle with lower class
no more single motions
more solutions
Explanation:
World War I. Main article: U-boat Campaign (World War I)
See also: Mediterranean U-boat Campaign (World War I)
<span>Submarine warfare in World War I was primarily a fight between </span>German<span> and Austro-Hungarian U-boats and Atlantic supply convoys bound for the </span>United Kingdom<span>, </span>France<span>, and </span>Russia<span>.</span>
"Napoleon led his army against both Bismarck and Garibaldi but could not defeat them" is the statement among the following choices given in the question that <span>best describes Napoleon’s role in the nineteenth century movements to unify Germany and Italy. The correct option among all the options given is option "B".</span>
The first principal of Mercantilism was that all the money and wealth in the world were relatively static. The second principal of Mercantilism was that a country's wealth could be based on their fossil fuels, and resources. The third principal of Mercantilism was the striving belief that exports needed to be higher than imports.
