The argument is <em>that children go to school to learn not to teach their elders ,</em> where teachers can be included. Public schools are subsidised with taxes. Bearing this in mind, we may say that taxpayers send their children to school for them to learn not to teach. This was what the taxpayers did when <em>they themselves </em>were students . Therefore, t<em>axpayers send their children to school on the premise that, at their age, they needed to learn, not teach </em>is the reasoning of the argument.
Answer:
Yes, it's possible to succeed without a college degree. But with so many programs designed to take you from having no experience in a field to being highly-skilled and job-market ready, having a college degree offers a clear advantage. Most of us aren't Steve Jobs.....
but we can be even better......
U 2 can help me by marking as brainliest.........
Answer:
The Answer is - A - It reinforces the difference between the natural things the speaker holds dear and the rituals of the church.
Explanation:
I'm smart
Answer:
understand the theme of a text
