Answer:
The principle of judicial restraint
Explanation:
The principle of judicial restraint advocated for judges to restrict/limit the use of their own power to influence the outcome of court cases.
This principles is encouraged in order to prevent the judge's emotion from taking over the decision making process rather than their critical thinking. It also asserts that the judges only needed to use their power only if they are facing the laws that are clearly unconstitutional.
Answer: The origin of the case was somewhat trivial, but had great implications for the role of the Supreme Court in government. Marbury was appointed by John Adams, the president before Madison, as a district judge in Washington DC. When Madison became president, he didn't deliver the papers to finalize Marbury's appointment.
Marbury took him to Court, and although the Court initially sided with Marbury, the court, with John Marshall serving as Chief Justice, ultimately determined that the law that allowed Marbury to take the case to court was not constitutional. This meant that the law was struck down.
This was the first incidence of the Supreme Court exercising judicial review, the review of laws to determine constitutionality and their rejection if they are not, in the history of the United States. It was a landmark case not for the spat between Marbury and Madison over a district judgeship, but because it marked a huge expansion of the power of the Supreme Court (and thus the judicial branch).
We have seen the power of judicial review exercised in many cases since this one, such as Miranda vs Arizona (which established the law that police must read you your 'Miranda Rights' when they arrest you) and Plessy vs Ferguson, which determined that laws governing "seperate but equal" facilities for people of different races were in theory inherently unequal, and in practice clearly offered worse facilities to people of color.
I uploaded the answer to a file hosting. Here's link:
tinyurl.com/wtjfavyw
Answer:
Among the options given on the question the correct answer is option B.
Mexican American
Explanation: The Mexican American was the ethnic group who fought for the immigration policy reform during 1960s. Because after the second world war there was a internment of Japanese in America as they were involved in the World War ll. There were a lot Mexican American workers in the America who took a large portion in the labor group.
However,the newly immigration policy was not favorable for the Mexican American workers. There was thousand of Mexican who were waiting on the other side of the border to get immigrated in the USA.
But the immigration law was not suitable for this. As a result the Mexican American workers fought to reform the policy.
Solution Here
The feminist movement has effected change in Western society, including women's suffrage; greater access to education; more equitable pay with men; the right to initiate divorce proceedings; the right of women to make individual decisions regarding pregnancy (including access to contraceptives and abortion); and the right to own property. Harvard Psychology Professor Steven Pinker argues that feminism has reduced domestic violence against men as their likelihood of being killed by a female intimate partner has decreased six-fold. However, fourth-wave feminism has coincided with significant increases in male violence and femicides against women, a lot of it regarded as a backlash.
academicgurusintl at g-mail dot com
