In this article, Li and Gleitman are questioning the implications of the Whorf–Sapir linguistic relativity hypothesis.
The hypothesis argues (based on linguistic studies of Mayan populations) that the language of a society determines the members’ spatial reasoning, or the way they think about locations and distances. The Mayans use a spatial-coordinate system (ex. “to the north”) as opposed to a viewer-perspective system (ex. “to the left”).
Li and Gleitman question the findings, and they devise a research that involves only English speakers, but where they manipulate landmark cues. While they do not claim to have proven the Whorf–Sapir linguistic relativity hypothesis wrong, they argue that the availability of landmark cues plays a larger role in spatial reasoning than the linguistic system itself.
The Navajo code, which was not really a new code, was used during WWII.
The Navajo code could not be deciphered because it wasn't a code at all it was the native language of the Navajo.
The second amendment gives Americans the right to "keep and bear arms"
Hope I helped
When nurse manager determines the work shifts for the staff based on a predetermined health care facility guidelines an example of rule-utilitarianism decision making.
<h3>What is Rule utilitarianism in
decision making?</h3>
Rule utilitarianism can be described as the form of utilitarianism which states that an action is right as it conforms to a rule .
In conclusion, this states that the rightness or wrongness of a particular action serves as the function of the correctness with respect to a rule.
Learn more on decision making at:
brainly.com/question/12550670
#SPJ1
Answer:
A dead relative because I want to know what happens when u died or how was your life before and how do you view the world know. If this doesn't work then maybe a famous person back then like Albert Eienstien and see what he thinks/views of society now.
Explanation:
