1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
andre [41]
3 years ago
8

One post-war goal of the United States that created tension with the USSR wasthe US desire to create a buffer zone in Eastern Eu

rope.the US need to establish puppet governments in Europe.the US push to promote democracy around the world.the US desire to move away from a capitalist economy.
History
2 answers:
aleksley [76]3 years ago
6 0

Answer: The US desire to create a buffer zone in Eastern Europe.

Explanation: edg 2020

Anni [7]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

US desire to create a buffer zone in Eastern Europe

Explanation:

After the World War II ended, the countries that were on the wining side started to negotiate about how the continent would be divided, organized, and of course they tried to implement and force their own ideologies. This immediately created lot of tensions between the USSR and the US.

Among the numerous things on which the USSR and US failed to make an agreement, was also the US desire to create a buffer zone in Eastern Europe. Basically, the US wanted the territory from Poland's western border to the USSR's western border to be a buffer zone.

The USSR didn't fancied this. Instead, the USSR saw all territory in Eastern Europe as its zone of influence and control after the war, and on top of it it planned on making it its stronghold. What the US was suggesting was seen as conflict of interest, but also a military threat on the border, so immediately the tensions rose between the two.

You might be interested in
HELP! What was the compromise that the supporters of the Constitution gave to those states that were afraid of a strong central
kirill [66]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

The Bill of Rights was put in place to check the government interference on people's personal liberties as a compromise to ratify the Constitution.

4 0
2 years ago
Question 5 of 5
Contact [7]

Answer:  Choice C.

They worried that Lincoln would try to end slavery in the United States.

==========================================================

Explanation:

The issue of slavery was debated and fought over for many years before the election of 1860. It was only until Lincoln became president that sparked the southern states to secede, which led to the Civil War. Proof of this is found in the many Declaration of Secession documents produced by each state that left the union. This is basically a document explaining why they left the United States to form the Confederate States of America (CSA) aka the Confederacy.

In modern times, some people mistakenly claim that the Civil War wasn't over slavery but rather states' rights. This is simply false. The documents I mentioned prove that slavery was the core issue. More proof is the various states having issues with the fugitive slave act, in that the northern states didn't really adhere to the law to the level of the southern states' liking. I guess you could argue that states' rights were involved, but specifically the south fought to have the right to own slaves. In short, it's all about getting the correct context. Expanding that context, simply look at the decades preceding the war and notice all of the tension involving whether a new state was a free state vs a slave state.

8 0
2 years ago
What was General John Burgoyne's "master plan” for defeating the Patriots in 1777?
larisa [96]

Answer:

In the spring of 1777, Major General John Burgoyne proposed a plan for defeating the Americans. Believing that New England was the seat of the rebellion, he proposed cutting the region off from the other colonies by moving down the Hudson River corridor while a second force, led by Colonel Barry St.Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
What are the negative effects of considering political leanings when selecting Supreme Court Justices?
Snowcat [4.5K]

The negative effects of considering political leanings when selecting Supreme Court Justices include:

  • The risk of bias
  • The possibility of selecting an unqualified an inexperienced person

<h3>What are political leanings?</h3>

In the U.S., some people belong to the conservative political group while others belong to the liberal or democratic group.

It is wrong to select a Supreme Court Justice on any of these basis because the emotion is a major player that can lead to the wrong choices.

In such cases, the qualifications of the candidates might be overlooked due to bias.

Learn more about political leanings here:

brainly.com/question/1470181

#SPJ1

6 0
1 year ago
Is it immoral to fly the confederate flag today? Why or Why not?
lorasvet [3.4K]
Because that flag represents a culture that most do not appreciate. It shows the mistakes of the USA and how we treated humans like animals it was immoral, and we needed to grow from it and remember the mistakes not celebrate them.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the nature of the south vietnamese government hamper the fighting of the war?
    10·1 answer
  • In what year was the fourteenth amendment ratified?
    6·1 answer
  • Which group did not have citizenship right under the Texas constitution of 1866
    6·1 answer
  • What marked the end of World War II
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following countries is involved in the north american free trade agreement?
    11·1 answer
  • Who was the aggressive confederate general most-feared by northerners
    5·1 answer
  • Which specialized court would be the first court to hear a case in which a child broke a state law?
    10·2 answers
  • Once the Bill passes BOTH houses of Congress it
    13·1 answer
  • Who was George whitefeild and what did he do?
    13·2 answers
  • Study the graph showing the number of male and female Americans by age.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!