Answer:
Most of the states in ancient India were politically stable. They often remained for long periods free from internal squabbles and intrigues of the kind we see today. This situation helped them a great deal in initiating measures aimed at improving the quality of life of the common people. How could the states enjoyed political peace for long stretches of time to undertake such measures? The answer is that the origin of the state in ancient India was strongly believed to lay in dharma (religion) itself and, therefore, treated as an institution not to be opposed or disobeyed.
A close study of the scriptures of ancient India reveals that the people during the Vedic and later periods firmly believed that the state had been set up by god Himself. One of the India, Kautilya, held the view that God created the state for administering a benevolent yet strict rule over the people. Manu, the famous lawgiver, said that the state was needed to enforce discipline in the life prone to act in unrighteous ways.
Explanation:
To preserve a balance between and states, Congress enacted the Missouri Compromise, which allowed slavery to expand the state of Main alongside the state of Missouri but not in the rest of the Louisiana Territory.
The Missouri Compromise was a piece of federal legislation in the United States that struck a balance between northern states' aspirations to stop the spread of slavery in the nation and southern states' desires to do so.
Between July 4, 1805, and June 4, 1812, when it was renamed the Missouri Territory, the Territory of Louisiana or Louisiana Territory was an organised, incorporated territory of the United States. By a vote of 24 to 20, the Senate first approved an amendment that forbade slavery in the Louisiana Territory north of the 36° 30' latitude line, with the exception of Missouri.
To know more about Louisiana Territory refer to: brainly.com/question/10851096
#SPJ4
It requires that 50 percent of a states white male take a loyalty oath to be readmitted to the union.
The answer is Ethnic groups
Answer:
There are so many steps because they need to see if the law is good and worth passing and won't infringe on people' rights. The positives of this process is that they will have time to analyze the law and see the pros and cons. Civilians will also be able to weigh in on the law. The negatives are that even if the law needs to be passed quickly, it can't, because it needs to go through each step.
