Answer:
Madison argued in favor of a larger republic
Explanation:
According to his paper "Federalist 10", Madison argued that a representative body that is too small be insufficient to represent all of the interests and opinions of the nation. The larger the representative body, the better since it allows more opinions and prevents tyranny.
"...the same advantage which a republic has over a democracy...is enjoyed by a large over a small republic," (Third to last paragraph of Federalist 10)
<em>Workers in towns may find it more difficult to join a union if corporate stores refuse to sell items to union members. Because the union and its members cannot benefit from these stores, and vice versa. This makes joining a union in a town difficult.</em>
<em></em>
<em>Consider marking "Brainliest". </em>
<em></em>
<em>- Robert</em>
The Articles of Confederation, was in effect from March 1, 1781, when Maryland ratified it. The second, The Constitution, replaced the Articles when it was ratified by New Hampshire on June 21, 1788.
I don't know is this right. hit I say because many federalist deeply resented the power of the shareholding and who appear indifferent it inflicted forgot exomic harm on a region dependent on maritime commerce
