1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nexus9112 [7]
3 years ago
14

Without the evolution of the assembly line, what might the cost of goods look like? The price of goods would not change, despite

the assembly line.
The price of goods would rise, because of the law of supply and demand.
The price of goods would drop, because there would be fewer goods available on the market.
The price of goods would decrease, because more skilled workers would become trained.
History
2 answers:
nikdorinn [45]3 years ago
8 0

I believe the answer is B. The price of goods would rise, because of the law of supply and demand.

sashaice [31]3 years ago
4 0

The correct answer is B.

If the assembly line had not been implemented in production processes, while the consumer side would remain equal (same amount of people would demand a certain product according to their needs and preferences), <u>the amount supplied of such product in the market would plunge. </u>

This excess of demand will entail a relative scarcity scenario (nº of people who demand the product is much larger than the total units of output generated), therefore prices would rise and, finally, only those consumers who are willing to pay, or can afford the new expensive price, will receive the product. <u>Price adjustment has ocurred for the allocation of the units produced among the existing consumers</u>, leading to a new market equilibrium.

You might be interested in
The first cultures of South America developed in the ____ region.
umka2103 [35]
Peru area
it is the oldest civiliazationb
6 0
3 years ago
Are you surprised to hear what Jesus said about the scribes and Pharisees? Those actions, don't we do the same thing? Who’s glor
slamgirl [31]

I'm not really surprised about what Jesus said about the scribes and the Pharisees because, according to what the Bible relates through the four gospels, which give great indications of the social form in the time of Jesus, people like the scribes and the Pharisees sought to enrich themselves by promulgating the word of God and only pretending.

The Pharisees, as Matthew 23:23 says, did not act with justice or mercy, therefore, I consider that Jesus simply told them something that corresponded to the truth of his hearts.

Very surely today people make mistakes, sometimes we are unjust, some other people are unfaithful or hypocritical, but perhaps what differentiates a current person from the Pharisees is that he does not regularly enact good works pretending to be holy (in most cases cases), but <u><em>we are aware that, as sinful people, we must consider our actions and expect to improve day after day</em></u>.

Personally, I seek the glory of God, because he is the one who has given us all the blessings that we currently enjoy and who protects us at all times, I feel protected knowing that God approves my way of acting.

If you want to know a little more about the justice promulgated in the bible, please visit the following link: brainly.com/question/18004918?referrer=searchResults

4 0
3 years ago
The party in power usually acts as the "watchdog".<br> true or false
WITCHER [35]
False. Watchdogs should check on the activites of leaders. A party in power can.t check on itself. 
8 0
3 years ago
What was it called when 1.5 million African-Americans moved form the south to the north?
Kryger [21]

Answer:

Yeah, The Great Migration is correct

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did theater change during the days of William Shakespeare and the Globe?
Sidana [21]

<u>William Shakespeare </u>still has a profound influence on theater. We can summarize this influence in<u> five big changes</u>: 1. The <em><u>theater was exclusively reserved for the wealthy and the educated</u></em>. With the emergence of his writings, came tales that appealed to the masses. 2. <em><u>His plays were often imbued with universal truths of human existence,</u></em> rather than acting as mirrors of the privileged life. 3. The way in which Shakespeare’s <em><u>plots move forward has helped define modern play-writing.</u></em> 4. A <em><u>new type of storytelling</u></em> in which characters’ choices drive plots forward and as a consequence, journeys in his plays are dynamic. 5. <u>Shakespeare</u> invented <em><u>genres that mixed both tragedy and comedy. </u></em>

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why is South Africa’s elections successful
    8·1 answer
  • One reason that protestors may have chosen nonviolent methods was to
    13·1 answer
  • Which is an example of a reserved power?
    9·2 answers
  • After world war 1 which of the following led to the creation of turkey iran,and saudi arabia
    6·1 answer
  • What kind of tools did people use during the Paleolithic era
    7·1 answer
  • Was the bay of pigs invasion successful in american standards?why or why not?
    8·1 answer
  • How are Jews and Christians different in regards to Messianic thought?
    7·2 answers
  • All of the following applies to Lexington &amp; Concord except for what?
    9·1 answer
  • Which powers are solely at the state level​
    14·2 answers
  • Castles were built on high places primarily for:
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!