Without the evolution of the assembly line, what might the cost of goods look like? The price of goods would not change, despite
the assembly line. The price of goods would rise, because of the law of supply and demand.
The price of goods would drop, because there would be fewer goods available on the market.
The price of goods would decrease, because more skilled workers would become trained.
If the assembly line had not been implemented in production processes, while the consumer side would remain equal (same amount of people would demand a certain product according to their needs and preferences), <u>the amount supplied of such product in the market would plunge. </u>
This excess of demand will entail a relative scarcity scenario (nº of people who demand the product is much larger than the total units of output generated), therefore prices would rise and, finally, only those consumers who are willing to pay, or can afford the new expensive price, will receive the product. <u>Price adjustment has ocurred for the allocation of the units produced among the existing consumers</u>, leading to a new market equilibrium.
How did the 1898 Treaty of Paris shift the balance of power in the world? It imposed unpopular war reparations that contributed to the rise of totalitarianism in Europe. It ushered in an extended period of isolationism by the United States and European powers.
Oftentimes, the idea of "conversion" is best explained as "<span>The process of cultural change brought about by immigration," since this can apply to wide variety of changes. </span>
Answer: in the words of Thanos "a small price to pay for salvation" I mean when the south lost the civil war it allowed the slaves to be set freed if the south would've won there would be slaves to this day
