Answer: win because Bill had a legal right to drink alcohol.
Explanation: Bill is twenty-five years which is above the alcohol consumption age. However, if Bill uncle now refuses to pay Bill as agreed. The uncle claims that because Bill suffered no detriment by refraining from alcohol, and that because his non-drinking did not constitute consideration, no contract was formed. If Bill sues his uncle, Bill will win because Bill had a legal right to drink alcohol at that age.
Answer:
1. less;
2. implicit;
3. explicit
Explanation:
The Implicit Association Test (IAT) is a form of testing or research technique, that seek to measure the level of relationship between concepts and evaluations or stereotype. For example, races and performance.
Also, various research studies, have shown that Implicit Association Test is a better predictor of subsequent behavior than explicit responses.
Hence, in this case, people who reported low levels of prejudice but whose scores on the Implicit Association Test (IAT) indicated negative attitudes about blacks were LESS likely to vote for Obama because IMPLICIT attitudes were better predictors of behavior than EXPLICIT attitudes.
Well from the basic economic definition, the opportunity cost is the cost of the next best alternative which is forgone when a choice is made.
Here the opportunity cost would be not going to work.
