Answer:spouse is true love sister is sibling love
Explanation: sorry if this is wrong but i dunno the choices soooo ya
Hope this helps!
IDEAL FAMILY
An ‘ideal’ family is one that has the<u> morays, morals, beliefs and actions</u>, convictions that are shared and developed by the whole. If you are a practising Jewish person and lived with an agnostic family, there is an unbalance of your intent within this whole. While you may respect one another, your daily practice is out of sync.
An ideal family would be people who <u>live in total comfort with each other, and couldn’t even imagine life without their family members even if they have to live in a tiny room together</u>
Many families are said to be ideal when <u>everyone gets along</u>, and never fights, and love each other amazingly.
This is a very hard expectation to live up to. In a humans nature, we are guaranteed to fight every once in a while, even with the happiest personalities.
It also depends on the personalities of the family members. Some families act different, to morph into the right fit for those people in the family. Putting one kind of family for all families is very very close to impossible.
But what you should note is what is <u>not</u> an ideal family.
- Being afraid of the parents
- Feeling like you can’t tell anyone anything
You just need to observe and find the best fit for everyone in your family to get so,what along and be happy. That is the greatest gift someone can give to a family
So, the core of the study is the behaviour and personality - and this is usually studied by psychology. Therefore we can guess that we are looking for a branch of psychology.
This branch is social psychology - it focuses how the society (social environment) influences this behaviour.
Ruling out rival hypotheses, Findings consistent with several hypotheses
require additional research to eliminate these hypotheses. More five principles
of critical thinking are: (1.) Correlation vs. Causation, the fact that two
things are associated with each other doesn’t mean that one causes the other.
(2.) Replicability, a finding must be capable of being duplicated by
independent researchers following the same recipe. (3.) Occam’s Razor,
if two hypotheses explain a phenomenon equally well, we should generally select
the simpler one. (4.) Falsifiability, claims
must be capable of being disproved. (5.) Extraordinary Claims, the more a
claim contradicts what we already know, the more persuasive the evidence must
be before we should accept it.
Hi, would like to help you, but what do you mean? the prime meridan or?
