Answer:
a)
Step-by-step explanation:
In a study, if we want to measure of establish a relation between two variables, we say that there is a confounding variable when there is a third variable that is having an effect on our original two variables but this third variable wasn't originally measured in our study. Therefore our results are misleading because the relation between our two variables is being influenced by the confounding one.
This is why the correct answer would be the a) An explanatory variable has a great effect on a response variable. And this causes a misleading interpretation between the two variables.
7/11 the gas station never heard of 7/12 h
The function was moved two units to the left (a)
Answer:
$80,000
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Define the variables</u>:
Let x = "fish-flavored" chicken company investment (in dollars)
Let y = spray-on vitamins company investment (in dollars)
If Allen invested a total of $100,000:
⇒ x + y = 100000
Given:
- 3% profit on "fish-flavored" chicken investment
- 1% profit on pray-on vitamins investment
- Total profit = $2,600
⇒ 0.03x + 0.01y = 2600
Rewrite the first equation to make y the subject:
⇒ y = 100000 - x
Substitute into the second equation and solve for x:
⇒ 0.03x + 0.01(100000 - x) = 2600
⇒ 0.03x + 1000 - 0.01x = 2600
⇒ 0.02x + 1000 = 2600
⇒ 0.02x = 1600
⇒ x = 80000
Therefore, Allen invested $80,000 in the "fish-flavored" chicken company.
Answer:
2/19
Step-by-step explanation:
i just took the test and no one helped me i got is wrong but when you go back to review it it tells you the answer hope im not too late
