Answer:
The story of Daniel provides the lesson of having faith under difficult times.
Explanation:
the reason behind this answer is that in the story the hardest time Daniel passes is when he is thrown to the pit with the lions. Then, he prays to god and the lions don't eat him. Because he had such a big faith that God came to him and protected him from the lions. Then, he was blessed by God and his life changed. Providing us the lesson of having faith in our hardest times.
Answer:
c sjsjejdjdjdjdjdididi C is the right I think
It shifted from nobles to kings
Many people of the United States and Europe held protests related to the Rosenbergs’ trial because they thought that the Rosenbergs had not been given a fair, impartial trial. They claimed that it was unfair to sentence them to death.
EXPLANATION
The Rosenberg trial was one of the major events in America in the early fifties related to the anti-communist movement. Ethel and Julius Rosenberg were sentenced of conspiracy to hand over atomic secrets to the Soviet Union. They were executed on June 19, 1953. To this day their trials are still controversial.
During the Manhattan Project, espionage became a major issue for the United States government. Some of the people who worked on the Manhattan Project were spies who provided information about the details of the atomic bomb to the Soviet Union. Thus, some of the scientists claim that espionage contributed to accelerating the progress of the Soviet Union's nuclear weapons program. Julius Rosenberg was one of the Soviet spies. Julius is a US-based electrical engineer. Julius acts as a spy with his wife Ethel. They met when they were activists of the Communist Party.
LEARN MORE
If you’re interested in learning more about this topic, we recommend you to also take a look at the following questions:
• What was one point of the appeal of the death penalty for the Rosenbergs?
brainly.com/question/933653
KEYWORD: communist, Manhattan Project, fairness, the Rosenbergs
Subject: History
Class: 10 - 12
Subchapter: Rosenberg
The correct answer is B) Roosevelt introduced a Court-packing plan to add justices to the Supreme Court in order to counterbalance the pro-business justices who were already serving.
Unfortunately, you forgot to attach the excerpt or the text. Where is it? Without the excerpt, we can only research for some information that can have sense.
So, taking that into consideration we can say that the way Roosevelt most likely warranted the criticism contained in the excerpt is "Roosevelt introduced a Court-packing plan to add justices to the Supreme Court in order to counterbalance the pro-business justices who were already serving."
Franklin D. Roosevelt’s court-packing plan sought to change the makeup of the Supreme Court by expanding the nine-member Court with up to six more judges.
Rosevelt announced his intention to expand the Supreme Court with six more members to have 15. The announcement was made on February 5, 1937. The Bill's name was The Judicial Procedures Reform Bill of 1937, and Rosevelt’s main goal was to obtain the support of the Supre Court for his New Deal program. The Bill was never voted.
