The correct answer to this open question is the following.
These are the similarities and differences between Lieutenant Kotler and Pavel.
Let's talk about Lieutenant Kotler first. He is a young official in the Nazi army. He works at the Auschwitz concentration camp. He loves the Nazi ideology and feels proud of his superiority over the Jewish race. He is stubborn and arrogant. In the case of Pavel, he is just a prisoner that serves the family of Bruno. Pavel and Lieutenant Kotler are directly connected because they work for the family of Bruno.
Meanwhile, Pavel is humble, Lieutenant Kotler is egocentric. He likes to be admired and respected. Pavel likes discretion and he acts like that. Lieutenant Kotler is rude, aggressive with Jewish people and enjoys to offend them.
If eluded is supposed to be the word in italics, I’d select hindered as my answer!
The fact that everyone is freely expressing themselves without caring what others think!❤️
Answer: Russians faced many challenges and struggles working on collective farms.
<em>Animal Farm</em> by George Orwell is considered an allegory of the Russian Revolution and the implementation of communist policies in the region. In this story, the animals of a farm (workers) rebel and take the farm from the people (capitalists) in order to manage it themselves and enjoy all the profits of their labour. Although the project is promising at first, the dominant class (the pigs) is eventually not very different to the humans that dominated them before.
In this excerpt, Orwell describes the problems that Russians experienced when working on collective farms, such as lack of machinery and lack of expertise.
This question is incomplete. Here's the complete question.
Read The Lessons of Salem, by Laura Shapiro
What ironic situation does Shapiro describe in paragraph 3?
Answer: The irony of having those who “confessed” to witchcraft spared and those who defended their innocence being killed.
Explanation:
The Puritan witch hunts of 1692 would get confessions by torturing the suspects to justify the hunt itself, and those who would refuse to confess would end up being hung to death. The irony lies in the fact that none of the suspects had anything to do with witchcraft, and the proceedings of the trials were especially prejudicial to those who were honest.
