Answer:
<h3>Debate over representation when creating the constitution.</h3>
Explanation:
When the Constitution was being revised during the Convention of Philadelphia, 1787, the main debate that occurred was on the issue of representation. The larger states favored representation according to the size and population of the states while the smaller states demanded for equal representation of states regardless of size and population.
This debate led to the outcome of two agreements among the delegates. Firstly, there would be two national houses of legislature in the Congress - The House of the Representatives and The Senate respectively. Secondly, the number of representatives on the House of Representatives would be proportionate to the size and population of each state while the number of representatives in the Senate would be equal for every state.
The issue was solved through a resolution called the Great Compromise.
<span>1.
</span><span>The information scientists are getting from human
hair is one single strand can inform you what you consume and drink in
your diet. It can also enlighten you when and where the individual has been – geographic location.</span>
<span>
</span>
<span>2. </span> It
developed when a professor named Professor J. Ehleringer <span>from a
university in Utah began puzzled what animals consume and
drink and if they move over era. He then concludes that hair is like a tape
recorder and it can demonstrate what an individual consumes, drinks, and where they were at that era.</span>
<span>
</span>
<span>3. </span><span>An isotopic
analysis works by getting oxygen and hydrogen. Their dissimilar isotopes are located in different clusters but it is
depends on where the water comes from, then that mix gets put down in the tissues of
the animals or humans that consume the water.</span>
<span>
</span>
<span>4.
</span>Through isotopic
analysis, forensic scientists can recognize mutilated or weakened body; they
can also recognize what is the history of his life.
<span>5. </span><span>Forensic isotope analysis can help to identify a
mutilated executed victim. </span>
Answer:
Public goods are better than other goods.
Explanation:
A public good is a product that one person can consume but still it can be available for another person. Another one would not be deprived for the same. This makes public good non-rivalrous. For instance, public park is a public good. If person A is using it, B can also use it at the same time. Services like fire and police are also public goods and are available to all at the same time. Thus, public goods are mostly publicly financed and hence are better.
Private good like a piece of pizza can only be eaten only person 'A' at a given time. Person 'A' can exclude others from eating it unlike a public good.
Answer:
Hello Adam Here!
Explanation:
Their contributions as storytellers helped preserve the histories of their villages. They were important in keeping only the leaders connected to the gods. They developed ways to document the seasons and farming methods. Their paintings catalogued the stories about their one true god.
Happy to Help! :)
Answer: Effective but not efficient
Explanation:
Something is effective if it can help achieve a specific goal, delivering the expected outcome, while something is efficient when it provides the best possible outcome with the least waste of resources.
Something can be effective but not efficient.
Mary´s work is effective because it delivers the best cakes, but inefficient since three cakes get wasted.
