All categories

2 years ago

Help help help the choices are A.).10 B.).55 C.)05

Mathematics

2 answers:

ahrayia [7]2 years ago

8 0

.10 because 1.10 - 1.00 = .10

laiz [17]2 years ago

5 0

Answer:

10 cents

Step-by-step explanation:

total= $1.10

bat= $1.00

ball= $0.10

You might be interested in

20 POINTS PLEASE HELP ASP D:

Butoxors [25]

Hi there!

When two lines intersect, we know that the ones on the opposite sides are equal to one another. Thus, we know that the angle opposite of the one marked with 90 degrees (on the other side of the intersection) is also 90 degrees.

We know that a full turn is 360 degrees. We can see that the two 90 degrees make up part of the turn, and the other pair of angles, both of which are equal to x (as per the reasoning above), make up the rest. We know that the two 90 degrees, added together, is equal to 180 degrees. This means, after subtracting 180 from 360, that 180 degrees are remaining that aren't the 2 90 degrees, and are make up of two angles both measuring x degrees.

As we know that they both measure x, then we know that we say 2x = 180, which gives us x = 90.

Hope this helps!

6 0

3 years ago

I need help with these two fraction questions :(

sammy [17]

Answer:

$6 \times \frac{13}{24}$

5 0

2 years ago

Many companies use well-known celebrities as spokespersons in their TV advertisements. A study was conducted to determine whethe

s2008m [1.1K]

Answer:

There is enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion of brand awareness of female TV viewers and the gender of the spokesperson are not independent (P-value = 0.01537).

Step-by-step explanation:

The question is incomplete: the picture attached gives the missing sample data.

This is a hypothesis test for the difference between proportions.

The claim that is going to be stated in the alternative hypothesis is that the proportion of brand awareness of female TV viewers and the gender of the spokesperson are not independent. This means that the proportions differ significantly.

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis can be written as:

$H_0: \pi_1-\pi_2=0\\\\H_a:\pi_1-\pi_2\neq 0$

The significance level is 0.05.

The sample 1 (Male celebrity), of size n1=150 has a proportion of p1=0.273.

$p_1=X_1/n_1=41/150=0.273$

The sample 2 (Female celebrity), of size n2=150 has a proportion of p2=0.407.

$p_2=X_2/n_2=61/150=0.407$

The difference between proportions is (p1-p2)=-0.133.

$p_d=p_1-p_2=0.273-0.407=-0.133$

The pooled proportion, needed to calculate the standard error, is:

$p=\dfrac{X_1+X_2}{n_1+n_2}=\dfrac{41+61.05}{150+150}=\dfrac{102}{300}=0.34$

The estimated standard error of the difference between means is computed using the formula:

$s_{p1-p2}=\sqrt{\dfrac{p(1-p)}{n_1}+\dfrac{p(1-p)}{n_2}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{0.34*0.66}{150}+\dfrac{0.34*0.66}{150}}\\\\\\s_{p1-p2}=\sqrt{0.001496+0.001496}=\sqrt{0.002992}=0.055$

Then, we can calculate the z-statistic as:

$z=\dfrac{p_d-(\pi_1-\pi_2)}{s_{p1-p2}}=\dfrac{-0.133-0}{0.055}=\dfrac{-0.133}{0.055}=-2.44$

This test is a two-tailed test, so the P-value for this test is calculated as (using a z-table):

$P-value=2\cdot P(z$

As the P-value (0.01537) is smaller than the significance level (0.05), the effect is significant.

The null hypothesis is rejected.

There is enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion of brand awareness of female TV viewers and the gender of the spokesperson are not independent (the proportions differ).