Beth's description of the transformation is incorrect
<h3>Complete question</h3>
Beth says that the graph of g(x)=x-5+1 is a translation of 5 units to the left and 1 unit up of f(x) = x. She continues to explain that the point (0,0) on the square root function would be translated to the point (-5,1) on the graph of g(x). Is Beth's description of the transformation correct? Explain
<h3>How to determine the true statement?</h3>
The functions are given as:
g(x) = x - 5 + 1
f(x) = x
When the function f(x) is translated 5 units left, we have:
f(x + 5) = x + 5
When the above function is translated 1 unit up, we have:
f(x + 5) + 1 = x + 5 + 1
This means that the actual equation of g(x) should be
g(x) = x + 5 + 1
And not g(x) = x - 5 + 1
By comparison;
g(x) = x - 5 + 1 and g(x) = x + 5 + 1 are not the same
Hence, Beth's description of the transformation is incorrect
Read more about transformation at:
brainly.com/question/17121698
#SPJ1
Answer: 0.7748
Step-by-step explanation:
Given : Number of bit bulls at the pound = 18
Number of pit bulls have attacked another dog in the last year =4
The proportion of pit bulls have attacked another dog in the last year:
Number of the pit bulls selected = 6
The probability of that none of the pit bulls in Joe's group attacked another dog last year : 
By using binomial , the probability that at least one of the pit bulls in Joe's group attacked another dog last year is given by :-
Hence, the required probability = 0.7748
Answer:
4.48
Step-by-step explanation:
4.00 + 12%(.48)= 4.48
Answer:
yeah thats sad
Step-by-step explanation:
4th option
C because its value depend on the value of x
