One way the Fourteenth Amendment shows that the Constitution
is superior to state law is that the fourteenth amendment introduces the
citizenship law in the amendment’s first section which is made to put limits on
state laws and power and also for the protection of civil rights.
Answer:
Empress Theodora.
Explanation:
Theodora (497-548) was a higly influential figure in the emperor´s court. Her intelligence and political skills helped her win husband Justinian´s trust and admiration. She used power to promote her own interests through social and religious policies. She is seen as the most powerful woman in the history of Byzantium.
They were called abolitionists. <span />
The tax system was abolished and this was true about Chandragupta's rule of the Mauryan Empire. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the last option or the fourth option. Chandragupta was actually the founder of the Mauryan empire and it flourished greatly.
Answer:
Article VII, the final article of the Constitution, required that before the Constitution could become law and a new government could form, the document had to be ratified by nine of the thirteen states. Eleven days after the delegates at the Philadelphia convention approved it, copies of the Constitution were sent to each of the states, which were to hold ratifying conventions to either accept or reject it.
Explanation:
This approach to ratification was an unusual one. Since the authority inherent in the Articles of Confederation and the Confederation Congress had rested on the consent of the states, changes to the nation’s government should also have been ratified by the state legislatures. Instead, by calling upon state legislatures to hold ratification conventions to approve the Constitution, the framers avoided asking the legislators to approve a document that would require them to give up a degree of their own power. The men attending the ratification conventions would be delegates elected by their neighbors to represent their interests. They were not being asked to relinquish their power; in fact, they were being asked to place limits upon the power of their state legislators, whom they may not have elected in the first place.
