Among the northern Andean countries strongly involved in the illegal coca and drug trade, Columbia is now the predominant coca producer, so the answer would be option A.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
punnet squares show an estimated percentage
Explanation:
they determine the probability of an offspring having a particular genotype. u fill in the genotypes with the dominant and ressessive traits then u find the probalility of percentage. if it has moredominant traits as the percantage then it will be dominant if not it would be recessive
<span>Notice a couple of things
different between (A) and (B). It was NOT the first time a biologist
proposed that species changed through time (so it's not B). But it
finally *solidified* that idea by giving "change through time"
(evolution) a MECHANISM. It gave a plausible explanation for WHY
species change over time, in a testable way that made sense and had
evidence to support it.
So it finally dismissed the idea that species are constant.
It also emphasized that the simple presence of *variation* within a population was a key reason for evolution.
While we're at it ... (C) is wrong because it's not *individuals* that
acclimate (adapt) to their environment, but the population (the species)
as a whole.
And (D) is wrong because it had nothing to do with economics or the monarchy.</span>
A = 70, B = 10, C=20, D=20, E= 30, F=50.