The speaker which begins the poem has the primary transformation sought overall is recapturing of a sense of life's possibilities.
<h3>What is primary transformation?</h3>
The transformation in the poem means the transformation of the poet into the most authentic self. Primary transformation tells the meaning of the line of poem which the poet has written in the self authentic manner.
The speaker begins the poem by stating ,
"i come back to your youth, my nana"
Here, the primary transformation sought overall is recapturing of a sense of life's possibilities.
The speaker which begins the poem has the primary transformation sought overall is recapturing of a sense of life's possibilities.
Learn more about the primary transformation here;
brainly.com/question/2689696
#SPJ1
Answer:
107 degrees
Explanation:
The lines intersect to create a triangle. The sum of the interior angles of a triangle is 180 degrees.
a + b+ c = 180
We deduce the unlabeled angle (in the lower right corner) by considering the line that goes from that angle to the a angle on the left side. The line itself has a 180 degree angle (on each side). And we know the exterior angle is 107 degrees... that leaves 73 for the interior angle.
We take the equation above again... by putting now the value of C (the un-named angle):
a + b + 73 = 180
We isolate the a+b part... to get a+b = 107, the same value as the exterior angle.
The juxtaposition of adjectives (""and in. . . Shining"") creates a sensory impression of darkness with an interval of light.
<h3>What is an Adjective?</h3>
This is a word which is used to describe a noun. Since we were told that shining occurred then light was involved.
The most appropriate choice in this context is a sensory impression of darkness with an interval of light.
Read more about Adjective here brainly.com/question/24570768
The testimony regarding the man’s conduct during the three prior arrests is:
- The reason for this is that the prior events serve as impermissible character evidence.
<h3>What is irrelevant evidence?</h3>
Irrelevant evidence is the type of evidence that does not apply to the issue at hand and can cause a distortion of the facts.
In the case of the police officer in question, the evidence that he wants to present will cause confusion about the issues and possibly mislead the jury.
Learn more about irrelevant evidence here:
brainly.com/question/1865742
#SPJ1
Complete question:
A man has sued a police officer, alleging that the officer violated the man's civil rights by using excessive force while arresting him. At trial, the officer admits to having hit the man in the head with the butt of his gun but contends that the force was necessary because the man was resisting arrest. In support of his contention, the officer seeks to introduce evidence that the man had resisted arrest on three prior occasions during the last 10 years.
Is this testimony regarding the man’s conduct during the three prior arrests admissible?