<span>A stance that supports a particular interpretation of history is known as B. a historical argument. This is when you choose what to believe in - history may be interpreted in many ways, and all of them can be either wrong or correct, but it is up to you to choose that analysis which you thing is the right one. That analysis will be called a historical argument, because you will provide others with arguments as to why that interpretation should be correct.</span>
The two persons indicated above (Andrew Jackson and John Quincy Adams) were at some point in the history of America presidential candidates. One of them went on to win the elections because of their economic backgrounds. See the explanation below.
<h3>How were Adams and Jackson's backgrounds different, and how did they compare to those of earlier presidents?</h3>
The process of choosing a president in America altered in the year 1807. Only wealthy men could vote in prior elections, and as a result, whomever promised greater riches was chosen president.
The sort of candidate who won the election changed once the average person was allowed to vote in 1807.
Because the average person could vote in the election of 1828, they took advantage of the chance and chose whoever they believed would benefit them. As can be seen, the candidate who was more relatable to the electorate prevailed.
Overall, Jackson was favored over Adams by the populace because he could connect with them better and represented the American ideal.
Learn more about Andrew Jackson:
brainly.com/question/340840
#SPJ1
Answer:
Sparta was not quite the same as Athens in pretty much every manner, starting with its government. While Athens was a majority rule system, Sparta was a theocracy. In a government, the decision power is in the possession of a couple of individuals. Sparta's administration-just as Spartan culture-was committed to military strength. One of the primary ways they were comparative was in their type of government. Both Athens and Sparta had to get together, whose individuals were chosen by the people. Sparta was managed by two lords, who controlled until they passed on or were constrained out of office. Athens was controlled by archons, who were chosen yearly.
Explanation:
hope this helps
