Answer:
No. it was not possible because the American colonies were out to claim their independence.
Explanation:
The American colonies were already too involved in getting their independece, and once they freed themsleves they were not going to be willing to go back to the old colonies way, they wnated to establish a new way of govern where the government came out of the people and wanted to shift away from the old monarchy ways of reigning. They believed in a society where everyone had the right to be free, and pursuit happines, and the English way didn´t allow this. The American colonies initiated a change of times in the whole world, there was no going back from that.
Hi there. The way this question is stated is going to need some input from you to infer what was meant by the language.
This answer would be True. Because opportunity cost means more of one and less of another in simple terms, since in an economy we cannot utilize all of our resources at one time.
But I would caution that the language is in the simplest of terms! Since a more thorough definition would be that opportunity cost is the amount lost by not taking the next-best alternative. If your teacher and lesson usually describe opportunity cost and other terms simply, then I would say to go for it and choose True.
But if your lesson seems to be strict on definitions, then maybe that isn't the best definition. I would say it is good enough though because although simple, it does encompass the whole idea.
I hope this helps!
Answer:
Living in Georgia was good because it was never cold. Oglethorpe planned to settle Georgia as a refuge for debtors in England. They wanted to use the settlers to search for gold, and explore local rivers in hopes of finding a way to the East.
Explanation:
I HOPE THIS HELPS!!!!!!
It was "B. Philippe de Vitry" who was a Medieval composer and was also a politician and author famous for his writings on music theory, since at the time not many people knew the fundamentals of such theory.
<span>Before the civil war, slavery expanded in the south rather then in the north because, the north was primarily factories and the south was primarily agriculture. Agriculture required more hands on labor than factories. </span>
