Answer:
I've never read this book, but from what I can tell from this context, it seems like the answer is most likely is blind trust.
Explanation:
Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
Read this excerpt from the Declaration of Independence: The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world. The document then goes on to list a series of charges that denounce British rule of the American colonies. In the context of the Declaration of Independence, what does the author mean by “candid world”? What effect does this word choice have on the rhetoric as well as the intended audience of the text?
Answer and Explanation:
In the context of the declaration of independence, the author uses the text "candid world" to refer to the target audience and obtain the approval and support of that audience. This is because the word "candid" represents something pure and has not been corrupted. When the author uses this word to refer to the audience, he is stating that this audience is honest, impartial and correct. In this way, he wants to awaken the public's feelings and logic, which will support the idea that the government should not be biased, but honest and integral.
It should be noted that the evidence that best supports the conclusion that Gilgamesh is brave include:
- "Gilgamesh felt his courage return"
- "They charged at Humbaba"
<h3>
Gilgamesh</h3>
From the passage, Gilgamesh charged at Humbaba like two wild bulls and the monster let out a deafening cry.
The above statements best support the idea that Gilgamesh is brave since if they weren’t Gilgamesh would not feel his courage return and they will run away from Humbaba.
Learn more about Gilgamesh on:
brainly.com/question/10657570
